What are the difficulties in setting up an industry committee? Any suggestions?

I think the direct reason why it is difficult to set up the community industry Committee is the problem of the office and neighborhood Committee! The property company in each community has a direct work relationship with them! The establishment of the industry committee is a kind of understanding between the owners of the community formed by the long-term exploitation and extrusion of the property company, which is often a normal act of safeguarding rights after being forced to do so, and it is also supported by law! However, offices and neighborhood committees look at the establishment of industry committees by owners from another angle of maintaining stability! Therefore, the establishment of the office of the industry Committee itself will not support the legitimate behavior of the owners in the process of safeguarding rights! The office won't say anything, but it will set up various obstacles in behavior! Even if the industry Committee is finally established, the office and the neighborhood Committee will make use of the contradiction between the owners to create chaos! The office itself does not support the establishment of the daily work of the industry Committee in thought and action! This is a question of system and constitution!

The industry Committee is the easiest to let the property penetrate. The strongest property hits the owner, pulling the industry Committee into the hands of the property and doing things for the property. Building managers had better organize owners' meetings regularly to discuss the current strength and development direction of the community, and don't give the initiative to the property, otherwise it will be the property!

If there is a property service company, an owners' committee shall be established according to relevant laws and regulations. The power of the community owners' committee is to represent the owners' congress and sign the Property Service Contract with the property service company to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the owners. In principle, the party branch or neighborhood committee of a community neighborhood committee cannot represent the rights and interests of the owners' committee.

The relevant national laws and regulations or the provisions of provinces, cities, districts and counties are clear, but the property management company has deep pockets, and has joined hands with neighborhood committees or neighborhood offices to set up obstacles to prevent the community from setting up industry committees, and it is difficult for those who have set up industry committees to perform their duties.

I have a deep understanding of this. Our community management office is very poor, with high fees, opaque financial expenditure, poor service and a pile of empty wages. Finally, some owners couldn't bear it anymore and wanted to set up an industry Committee to contain the management office. However, after five years of tossing, the industry Committee has not been established. The resistance mainly comes from the following aspects.

First, the difficulties of functional departments. Now the property company is under the management of the real estate bureau, and the relationship is generally handled well, plus various interest disputes. The property definitely doesn't want to set up an industry Committee to supervise them. So while looking for various reasons to stop. Take our community as an example. The election of the original industry Committee was successful, and then you can go to the Housing Authority for the record. However, when we set up an industry committee, the Housing Authority and the districts will participate in the whole process. And find various reasons to say that our candidate is unqualified. For example, you don't pay management fees, or you are not suitable for age. It led to the bankruptcy of our industry Committee election.

Second, the turnout rate and the vote rate are difficult to meet the requirements. The election of the industry committee is actually a democratic voting process. In our country, democratic voting is so far away from us that many of our owners have no awareness of rights protection. Many things can't touch them, so they just watch. There are still many owners who are very busy at work, and some even don't move in at all. So it is difficult to reach 60% in the voting. Sometimes even if the turnout rate reaches 60%, the turnout rate is 5 1%. I can't do it either.

Third, the owners do not trust each other. Now, although everyone lives in the same neighborhood. But there is little communication between them, and they basically don't know each other. In this case, let them vote for the industry Committee. They don't know who to choose either. Some owners are very enthusiastic about doing all kinds of work, but in others' eyes, this owner must have ulterior motives for being so active. In this case, the election has also become extremely difficult.

Fourth, few owners are willing to stand up as candidates. At present, the general requirement of the industry Committee is 9 to 13, and the number of candidates is higher than this. And the industry committee is unpaid, just full of blood candidates, so when they are questioned by some owners, they will undoubtedly face great pressure in their hearts. Therefore, every election requires a lot of work before the owners are willing to stand up for election.

It is difficult to set up an industry Committee, but it is the beginning of suffering after its establishment. Needless to say, everyone knows.

Most of the industry committees are Kuilei, and there is no actual execution, because most of the property companies are set by developers. It is best to cancel all kinds of property companies and take over by localized communities.

Most owners' committees wholeheartedly provide tort for all owners of the community and protect the legitimate rights and interests of residents. There are also individual owners' committees that do things against the wishes of owners, help property companies, suppress owners, and extort owners. It is suggested that the owners' Committee should be lifelong.

Building unit system can effectively manage parks. But also the most reasonable and effective unit management mode. Why do you have to create "trouble" and piles of trouble for the owners? Or people with ulterior motives, drilling the trust loopholes of the owners, forcing things to rely on the owners. Is it hard to say that "material dependence" is the "back garden" for his family to make huge profits? Then I hope the country will make a good investigation. How much corruption and depravity is hidden in this gray economic chain? If we follow public opinion and people's wishes, other service roles can be employed in society!