The property company that asked the owner to dismantle the private guardrail was rejected.

The property company sued three households for installing guardrails privately, demanding that the guardrails be removed. Recently, the Houshayu Court of Shunyi District Court rejected the claim of the property company.

The plaintiff Property Management Co., Ltd. claimed that at the end of 2005, Yang and other three defendants built guardrails 40 cm outside the fa? ade of their houses without authorization, which affected the safety of the houses and caused hidden dangers to the living safety of the upstairs and other residents. The property company asked the three defendants to dismantle the guardrail built privately. The three defendants believe that they all live on the second floor of the community, and the first floor is a merchant. The guardrail is installed to protect the personal and property safety of family members. In addition, there is no agreement on the specifications of guardrail installation in the property contract signed with the property.

After on-site inspection and trial, the judge found that the installation method and specifications of the guardrail were not stipulated in the house entrustment management contract signed by the original defendant and the defendant, and the plaintiff claimed that the guardrail installed by the three defendants should be close to the outside of the window and should not exceed the window, which lacked legal basis.