The parking fee of tenants in a residential area in Shanghai has increased by 23 times. Is this price increase reasonable?

With the increase of private car ownership, the roads in many cities have become very crowded. Not only that, parking space planning in many communities is also very tight, which also leads some people to park their vehicles outside. Even in the community, those public parking spaces often rely on owners to grab parking spaces. You can't even rent a parking space. In a residential area in Shanghai, he collected parking fees from owners and tenants respectively, and the parking fees of tenants also increased by 23 times. So, is this reasonable for the property?

First, why should the property in this community raise the parking fees of tenants so much?

It is understood that there are few parking spaces in this residential area, and it is difficult for owners to park. Therefore, the property has come up with such a way to increase the parking fee of tenants from 150 yuan to 3,600 yuan a month, which is a full increase of 23 times, and almost no one can afford it. This is shutting out the tenant's car in disguise.

2. How do tenants and landlords react to this?

Because some owners are not local, but working in other places, these owners communicate with the property and want to rent parking spaces in their own names, but the property statement is that the property ownership certificate of the house and the driver's license of the vehicle must be one person, which also leads to the owner's inability to rent parking spaces instead of tenants in this way. After all, they can't park their cars, which may lead to many houses not being rented out.

Third, is the property practice reasonable?

There must be some owners who are in favor of this practice. After all, they also want fewer tenants, so there will be less competition for their parking spaces. However, for those who rent houses, they don't think so. Some people specialize in investment and may not be able to rent out these houses, so they are very anxious about it. In fact, in theory, this practice of property is unreasonable because it is unfair to tenants.