Can the unfinished property be managed in the later stage?

This "unfinished business" category is a bit unclear, and the power and responsibility of "being able to manage" are unclear.

First of all, property management companies are hired by all owners to provide property services. The relationship between the two parties is only valid within the term of the contract. Unless the disputes and matters between the two parties are not stipulated in the contract, the owner has no right to find out the bottom of the other party, unless the other party promises to include the terms of the contract in the negotiation of commercial terms.

Thirdly, it can only operate within its own business scope. Whether your unfinished business belongs to the normal property service category, "yes" is one kind of situation, "no" is another kind of situation.

For example:

Situation 1: The elevator often breaks down, and the previous property was not well maintained.

Elevator belongs to public facilities. Daily maintenance supervision is the responsibility of the property company, and it is the responsibility of the property company to coordinate maintenance if there is a problem. However, the cost is the responsibility of the property company, because in the property fee, the state stipulates that the maintenance and overhaul costs of facilities and equipment cannot be included in the property fee pricing. Therefore, the maintenance cost of the elevator is found by the developer during the warranty period and shared by the owners who participate in the use of benefits.

Situation 2: The kitchen leaks, and you always go downstairs. The previous property was repaired for you, but it was not good.

-The entrance door is a personal exclusive part, and any quality problems have nothing to do with the property management company. In the early stage, the property management company coordinated to help the owners maintain. If you don't collect money, you basically collect money from the developer to help coordinate maintenance during the warranty period. If the company has the construction qualification or construction resources in the later stage, it can help the owner coordinate the maintenance, but the cost should be paid by the owner. Once the problem between the owner and the downstairs neighbor goes to court, the compensation has nothing to do with the later property. Even if no warranty is issued, as long as the developer has not established a cooperative relationship with the new property, the new property has no obligation to help the owner maintain it for free, and even if the new property is willing to help the owner coordinate the developer, it does not undertake the obligation to help the owner coordinate OK.

Finally, the most likely problem in the alternation of old and new properties is the return of prepaid property fees. Paying the property fee in advance is only a dispute between the owner and the previous property. Later, the property did not bear the loss of the owner, nor did it have the obligation to help the owner coordinate. Of course, if the new property has such dynamic force, the owner can get a bargain.

Finally, if the property can be changed, there will be either an owners' committee, a government street office or a property office or a neighborhood committee to hire a new property and dismiss the old one. You should still find these leaders to deal with the problem clearly.