Hawaii coconut once killed a tourist. What was the whole process and result of the trial?

In the 1960s, an American tourist was sunbathing on the beach in Hawaii when a strong wind blew and a coconut fell from a tree more than 20 meters high, causing the tourist to die on the spot. The family of the deceased sued the state government in the Hawaiian state court.

The plaintiff believes that Hawaiian beach is a public beach, and the coconut groves on the beach belong to public property. The state government of Hawaii is directly responsible for managing all public facilities in this public place. The state government of Hawaii has an unshirkable responsibility for any personal injury or death caused by the disrepair of these public facilities.

The defendant refuted the plaintiff's point of view:

First, the state government has warning signs in coconut groves everywhere to remind tourists to beware of coconuts.

Second, the accident was purely accidental, and such casualties can only be blamed.

The plaintiff retorted that the warning signs unilaterally erected by the state government violated the rights and freedoms of citizens. The state government put up warning signs, indicating that they had foreseen the danger. The problem is that the state government has not fulfilled its responsibility to eliminate this danger.

The court ordered the state government to compensate the plaintiff for $6.5438 million. The lawsuit was won, and the trouble came again. It is said that many tourists rushed to the beach under the coconut trees after getting the news, waiting for the coconut to hit them. When the state government saw that it was not good, it organized a professional team to cut coconuts. Therefore, from the date of winning the case, coconut trees on Hawaiian beaches will no longer bear fruit.

Friends, if there is a similar case in our great motherland, how to solve it? In order to meet the national conditions, why not replace the coconut involved with a manhole cover? !