What is the truth behind the fact that the parking space bought by Daqing men is considered illegal by the property?

A man in Daqing bought a parking space in the parking lot of his own community. He has paid the management fee of 16 years continuously, but it was considered illegal by the property, which attracted the attention of netizens. However, after verification, the truth behind the incident was not that the man illegally occupied the parking space, but an oolong incident caused by a real estate developer's work mistake. Fortunately, after repeated investigations by men, their innocence was confirmed, and the disputed parking space did belong to men, not illegal possession.

Things have to start with the mistakes of real estate developers. It is understood that the real estate developer of the parking lot reported the number of sold parking spaces to the property and informed the property to lock the parking spaces. Therefore, in the absence of any verification, the property directly installed a ground lock on the parking space according to the instructions of the real estate developer, and the locked parking space was the parking space of the man.

The man who found that the parking space he bought was locked by the property and couldn't park, found the property theory, claiming that the parking space was purchased by himself 16 years ago, and asked the property to lift the ground lock and return the right to use the parking space to himself.

At this time, some closed properties require men to provide receipts for the purchase of parking spaces. It's a pity that it's been a long time since the men found out that the receipt for purchasing parking spaces in those years has long since disappeared, but the receipt for parking space management fees delivered continuously from 65438 to 2006 does exist. From this, in fact, it can be proved that the right to use the parking space belongs to men, otherwise, how can the management fee of 16 years be paid continuously?

Finally, after many discussions with the property theory, the property was forced to get in touch with the real estate developers. Finally, I learned that the real estate developer reported the wrong parking space number when notifying the property to arrange parking space locks, that is to say, the parking space just sold by the real estate developer is another parking space, and the parking space with status lock was indeed purchased by the man 16 years ago. Therefore, from the beginning to the end, the so-called man occupying the parking space is just an own goal caused by the wrong parking space number reported by the real estate developer.