The Fuzhou incident prevented a new property from settling down in a man's conflict and died suddenly. How should the man's family seek justice?

With more and more people living in cities, property, as a service unit, plays a very important role in the community. However, there are also some properties that only collect money and don't work, so some communities have replaced the original properties after setting up owners' committees. This time, the conflict in Fuzhou directly led to the death of a man. Netizens are also talking about this matter. After reading the relevant reports, I have my own views on this matter and share them with you.

The whole story.

Because the original owner was very dissatisfied with the property, he decided to dismiss the previous property and bid for a new property company. However, there was a problem when the property company rotated jobs, that is, the old property company blocked the entry of the new property company. In the conflict of the whole incident, a number of men in black appeared on the scene, and a man suddenly fell to the ground when he clashed with these men in black.

The progress of the event.

Shortly after the man fell to the ground, someone called the police and called an ambulance, but after being sent to the hospital, the man died because of the untimely rescue. According to the interview with the local news media, we can know that the conflict actually happened that morning, but at night, a lot of men in black suddenly appeared, and the community owners suspected that these men in black were all recruited by the original property.

What do I think of this matter?

For such a property company, we must pursue it to the end and let them make compensation and bear certain criminal responsibilities. After all, in this incident, the property management company has lost its trust in the owners, and they have been fired. It is reasonable that they should complete the handover and leave the whole community as soon as possible, but in the whole process, they not only did not cooperate, but clashed with the owners, which obviously violated the law.