Yulin High-tech Zone promises to give parking spaces free of charge. What do you think of this?

Yulin High-tech Zone promises to give parking spaces free of charge. What do you think of this?

First, the property in this community did not abide by the promise of giving the owners free parking spaces.

In Yulin, there is a residential property that negotiates with the owners of the bottom businesses to apply for parking spaces in front of the site, and promises to give each bottom business 1 to 4 free parking spaces. The owners also signed the relevant application materials. However, after the parking space application, the owner will charge for parking. The explanation given by the property is that I thought I could apply for a lot of parking spaces, but in the end there were only 70 parking spaces. If owners are given too many free parking spaces, there will be no management company to contract these parking spaces. However, in the eyes of the owners, the property simply did not comply with the original promise.

Secondly, this is a dishonest practice.

? Although the ultimate solution given by the property management is that customers who park for a long time can enjoy the annual parking fee of 1.200 yuan, there is no free parking space, which makes it more and more difficult for the owners of these shops to do business. After all, customers don't want to spend too much parking fees for meals or other consumption. Some people even think that this practice of property management has made their business worse than before. But judging from this incident, the property does have dishonest behavior. The boss of the bottom business is also worried when he looks at the damaged business every day.

Thirdly, I think we should find a more suitable way to solve this problem.

? Property wants to make money, and merchants want to save money. It can only be said that the staff of the property did not expect that there would be so few parking spaces in advance. It can only be said that it is thoughtless. However, it is not appropriate to pass this mistake on to the merchants. We should not decide and specify such a charging scheme without authorization. Instead, we should discuss with the contracting owner how to solve this problem. Only in this way can the contradictions between the two sides be reduced. For their own businesses, I believe that businesses can also take a step back.