The difficulties in developing the village collective economy mainly include

Although there is a realistic possibility to gradually develop the rural collective economy at present, it does not mean that the development and growth of the rural collective economy will be logical. To turn this possibility into the reality of rural reform and development, we still need to overcome many difficulties and obstacles.

1. Public opinion is still biased against the collective economy. In recent years, there is an atmosphere of denying the collective economy in Chinese academic circles. Some scholars exaggerate the particularity of typical collective economic villages such as Liu Zhuang, Nanjie and Huaxi, and ignore the historical inevitability and universality behind this particularity; Some scholars deny the rationality of the process of agricultural cooperation in China, and think that there is no collectivization in China, but only "collectivization", which directly paves the way for land privatization. In their view, the rural collective economy is not only inefficient and backward, but also inhuman, and it is a "hotbed" of corruption and village tyrants. The roots of these understandings are as follows: First, due to the uneven development of productive forces in various places, there are indeed many problems in the process of rural reform and development in China, especially in some "empty shell villages" of the collective economy, and the problems are even more serious. When reflecting on these problems, some people first regard the collective economy as the culprit intentionally or unintentionally, and simply don't think about the more serious problems brought about by the weakening of the collective economy. Second, we look at the relationship between public economy and non-public economy absolutely unilaterally, the relationship between decentralized family management and unified collective management in the two-tier management system of unification and separation, and the relationship between some people getting rich first and * * * being rich together, without seeing the unity of opposites between the two. Therefore, they can't see or ignore the advanced model of collective economy. As soon as they mentioned the collective economy, they immediately equated it with unclear property rights, low efficiency and poor management. They can't see the material foundation prepared by the reform and opening up for the gradual development of rural collective economy, and also ignore the fundamental desire of the broad masses of farmers for the development of collective economy, ignoring the reality and blindly emphasizing the reform direction of privatization. In their view, whoever emphasizes the development of the collective economy is extremely left and does not liberate.

2. Some places still lack corresponding policy support for the development of rural collective economy. Under the influence of unfavorable public opinion that the collective economy is conservative and backward, some places lack a relaxed policy environment for developing the collective economy, resulting in problems such as difficult loans for the collective economy and heavy tax burden. Some reform policies and measures are difficult to implement, and the party's principles and policies are a mere formality.

3. The construction of rural grass-roots party organizations needs to be strengthened. The development and growth of rural collective economy can not be separated from leaders with excellent skills and excellent style and powerful rural grass-roots party organizations. As early as 1987, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China issued the Notice on Deepening Rural Reform, requiring cadres of rural party branches, villagers' committees and cooperative organizations to be enterprising, pioneering, fair and able to lead the masses to get rich. In the rural areas where the collective economic strength is weak, party member's age is on the high side, his education level is low, party member's cadres are unstable, and the party organization's cohesion, appeal and fighting capacity are not strong. The construction of rural grass-roots party organizations, especially village-level party organizations, has become a bottleneck restricting the development of most rural collective economic organizations. Therefore, it has become an urgent requirement to strengthen the construction of the Party's rural grass-roots organizations and strengthen the Party's leadership over rural work.

4. The concept of collectivism has weakened. Collectivism is an important part of the socialist core value system and the soul of the collective economy. Due to the profound influence of small-scale peasant economy for thousands of years and the long-term and arduous ideological transformation of small farmers, under the conditions of the primary stage of socialism, farmers still inevitably preserve some thoughts and habits of the old society. In some places, the practice of "dividing but not unifying" and "emphasizing division but neglecting unification" has weakened the collectivism spirit formed by the broad masses of farmers over the years.

5. The shortage of talents has not been fundamentally improved. The introduction and cultivation of talents has become a major problem faced by rural collective economic organizations. The vast majority of rural collective economic organizations lack both talents who understand modern economic management and scientific and technological talents urgently needed for rural economic development. Some village-level collective economic organizations have some phenomena, such as unscientific decision-making, weak entrepreneurial concept, squandering collective accumulation, ignoring the loss of collective property, ignoring the laws of market economy, low added value of products in science and technology and weak competitiveness. Faced with these problems, members of rural collective economic organizations show more helplessness.