Job Recruitment Website - Property management company - Will Greentown be "harmonious" by suing the male owner of Greentown and accepting the nanny arson case?

Will Greentown be "harmonious" by suing the male owner of Greentown and accepting the nanny arson case?

I don't think it will be "harmonious"

The previous criminal proceedings against the nanny are awaiting the judgment of the second instance. This is a civil lawsuit. Lin Shengbin, the male owner, listed nine units including Greentown Property Service Group as defendants.

In the whole nanny arson case, nanny Mo Huanjing has to bear great responsibility, and the punishment for Mo Huanjing cannot be alleviated because of negligence in property management and fire control.

However, the responsibility of Greentown Property cannot be said to be completely absent. Lin Shengbin bought a house in the Blue Ocean Qianjiang District and paid the property fee. Fire-fighting facilities have been installed in the community, and passed the acceptance of supervision and fire-fighting departments. When the fire really caught fire, where did the fire control facilities go?

In case of fire, there is a smoke detection system in the community, so it should be reported to the fire control room of the community at the first time. Someone in the fire control room is on duty and will call the police as soon as possible. If the fire control room of the community is connected to the fire squadron, the fire squadron will know that there is a fire at the first time and send firefighters to put out the fire.

In fact, it was not the owner who called the police first, but the hostess, Zhu Xiaozhen, who was awakened by the smoke from the burning in her sleep and called the police. It stands to reason that the automatic fire emergency facilities should have alerted the police before people perceived the fire, but this is not the case.

When the fire truck arrived at the main entrance of the community around 5 am 1 1, the main entrance could not pass, which delayed the rescue time. In desperation, it only got a side door, which was locked, and the firemen removed it, which delayed some time. The fire emergency passage can't go. At this point, the property should bear a great responsibility.

In the process of fire fighting, the water pressure of the fire pump is not enough at the critical moment. How does the property maintain fire control facilities in peacetime?

The arson case of nanny in Hangzhou has been widely concerned by the whole country. I believe that the court will have a fair judgment on the responsibility of the property.

I am dad v every day. Please like it if you like it!