Tianjin man refused to "brush his face" into the community and sued the property for winning the case. What legal issues are involved in this matter?

At the first trial, Tianjin men believed that face information was personal sensitive information, and once leaked, it might endanger personal or property safety. And the facial information cannot be changed. If abused, the consequences will be unbearable for the property. The court held that the man did not provide corresponding evidence, such as evidence that face information was leaked or tampered with, so the property company did not infringe on his privacy. The man did not give up, but chose the second trial. This time, the man believes that the main legal issue involved in this case is the protection of personal information, not the right to privacy, and that the court of first instance is wrong in determining responsibility. The court of second instance revoked the judgment of first instance, and asked the property management company to delete the man's personal information, and provided other barrier-free access methods to compensate related expenses, totaling 6,200 yuan.

If you want to sue the property management company, you must provide relevant evidence. For example, the property management company used your information to conduct some profit-making activities, or leaked your information, causing corresponding property losses. It seems heartless, but the law is like this, and men can't provide corresponding evidence. But the man chose other ways, thinking that face information is a kind of personal information and needs protection, and the property management company violated the right to protect personal information.

When going to court, men spend more time and money, in fact, few people can do it. The male attorney also said that many people will not enter the litigation stage and negotiate with the property at most because the cost of safeguarding rights is very high and the process is extremely difficult. However, the success of the man's lawsuit will encourage more people who don't want to use face recognition to enter the community to protect their personal information rights and interests, and will not make the property company so complacent.

In doing so, men just want the property management company to let the owners enter the community through other means, instead of forcing the owners to brush their faces, hoping to change this situation and hope that people in similar situations can say no to their actions.