The difference between community autonomy and self-management

There is a certain difference between owner autonomy and self-management. Self-management is a form of owner's autonomy, and the premise of exercising self-management is the establishment of owner's self-management Committee. The scope and connotation of the two are different. Under normal circumstances, the owner's autonomy should also be entrusted to the property management company, but since the management is different, the owner manages the affairs of the community himself.

1. What's the difference between owner autonomy and self-management?

1, owner autonomy

Owner autonomy is "self-governance" and self-management is "self-management". Owners' autonomy refers to the establishment of owners' congress, the election of owners' committee as the executive body of owners' autonomy, the formulation of autonomy norms, and the independent decision of public property matters within the scope of this community, and then the owners' committee hires property companies or other managers to manage the community according to the norms of the owners' congress.

Article 3 of the Detailed Rules for the Implementation of Owners' Autonomy Management in Non-production Areas (Trial) stipulates: (1) Owners' Autonomy Committees shall be established in each living area. If there are less than 30 households, elect 1 owner representative to exercise daily management functions. For residential quarters with less than 30 households 120 households, three owners' representatives shall be elected to form an autonomous committee. 120 households elected five owners to form an autonomous Committee, whose regional management functions.

2, the owner from the tube

Owner's self-management is a form in which the owner exercises the right to choose the property service mode under the condition of self-management, that is, he manages the property area by himself without entrusting the property service enterprise or other managers.

Owners can decide whether to be autonomous or autonomous by voting at the owners' meeting. Owners' autonomy has public welfare. The purpose of the owner's exercise of autonomy is to safeguard the public interests of the community in which he lives. This publicity determines that the establishment and exercise of autonomy must be aimed at maintaining and promoting public welfare in the property area, but not at the self-interest of the founders or exercisers of owner autonomy.

Second, what are the types of owner's self-management?

There are two kinds of self-management.

1. The owners' committee set up a property management center to provide property management and services for this community.

2. The owners' congress establishes a property company model, in which the ownership and income rights of the property company belong to all owners, and several owners set up property companies on behalf of the owners' congress and the owners' committee, and the property companies belonging to all owners provide property management and services.

Self-management mode, whether it is self-built property management center or stock holding mode, can continue to develop another function after the capital account has accumulated to a certain extent, that is, owners' meeting, owners' committee and owners' supervision committee serve as shareholders' meeting, board of directors and board of supervisors respectively, which can not only continuously improve the environment, quality, added value and valuation of residential property, but also build, rebuild and expand residential property, which is similar to the value of residential real estate.

To sum up, the management of residential areas now basically depends on property companies. If the owners decide to be autonomous, they should set up the owners' committee through election. On the premise of autonomy, they can choose a variety of management methods, they can manage their own property or entrust a property company to manage it, instead of inviting outside property companies to manage themselves. The owner elected some representatives to take charge of the management.