Is it reasonable for the pool area of high-rise commercial housing to exceed 30%?

The pool area is controversial in commercial housing transactions, because it directly affects the actual use area and property fees of buyers. In the current commercial housing market, whether the pool area exceeds 30% is reasonable needs to be evaluated and discussed in combination with specific conditions.

We need to know the definition and function of pool area. The pool area refers to the public space area used in the whole building except the private area. These areas include corridors, elevators, stairwells, maintenance passages, public gardens, etc. The pool area exists to meet the needs of owners and communities to enjoy resources. It plays an important role in the safety and functionality of buildings.

Although the pool area is inevitable in commercial housing transactions, but whether the pool area exceeds 30% is reasonable or not still needs to consider the following aspects:

The proportion of pool area should conform to the actual situation and reasonable design standards. If the pool area of a building exceeds 30%, it may indicate that there is something wrong with the design and the interests of the owners are not fully considered. Property buyers buy the right to use, not ownership, so they should have the right to enjoy a reasonable use area.

The proportion of pool area should match the charging standard of property fees. Usually, the property fee is calculated according to the pool area. The pool area is too large, and buyers need to bear higher property fees, which is inconsistent with their actual use area. This will bring unnecessary economic burden to property buyers.

Excessive pool area will often lead to the problem of insufficient actual use area of owners. Property buyers spend a lot of money to buy a house, but the actual use area is only 60% to 70%, or even less. This violates the expectations and rights of buyers to a certain extent, and it is also easy to cause social dissatisfaction and public opinion disputes.

We can say that it is unreasonable for the pool area to exceed 30%. Property buyers buy commercial housing in order to obtain their own right to use, not to buy the ownership of public space. In the case of imperfect market norms and regulatory measures, property buyers can easily become the weak side of rights and interests.

For the case that the pool area exceeds 30%, the relevant regulatory authorities should strengthen supervision to ensure that the rights and interests of buyers are protected.

Reasonable pool area ratio standards should be formulated to ensure that property buyers can enjoy reasonable use area.

The relationship between pool area and property fee should be clarified to ensure that the charging standard of property fee matches the actual use area.

It is necessary to strengthen market supervision, crack down on violations and protect the legitimate rights and interests of property buyers.

Under the premise of protecting the rights and interests of buyers, the reasonable setting of pool area is an important means to improve the quality of life and the enjoyment of community resources. Property buyers should treat the pool area rationally. When buying a house, they should not only pay attention to the actual use area, but also pay attention to the environment, facilities and living quality of the community to ensure that their purchase decisions can better meet their own needs.

In the transaction of commercial housing, it is unreasonable for the pool area to exceed 30%. Property buyers need a reasonable use area, and the property fee should match the actual use area. Relevant departments should strengthen supervision and protect the legitimate rights and interests of property buyers.

At the same time, property buyers should also treat the pool area rationally, comprehensively consider various factors and make their own purchase decisions.