What legal responsibilities should epidemic prevention personnel bear for breaking into the house of the quarantined person and killing the pet dog?

I thought the epidemic would end, but I didn't expect another big outbreak. In order to quickly end the epidemic prevention and control work and prevent the epidemic from spreading in a large area, preventive measures must be taken. If an infected person appears in any community, this community will definitely be blocked. If you have had contact with people who report positive nucleic acids, it is also close contact, and isolation is needed at this time. Some are isolated at home, and some are sent to hotels for unified isolation. You were sent to quarantine, but the work was not finished. Epidemic prevention personnel still have to go to your house for disinfection every day. This round of epidemic prevention work has greatly improved the epidemic prevention of pets except infection. It is inevitable that some innocent lives will be injured by mistake. The thing is, a close contact was isolated in the hotel. By checking the monitoring of his home, he found that an epidemic prevention worker forced the lock to enter the home and killed his pet. In your opinion, what legal responsibilities should epidemic prevention personnel bear when they kill a pet dog? Let's have a chat.

First, the news that epidemic prevention personnel broke into houses was false.

However, it is now a society ruled by law. General epidemic prevention personnel are residents with high ideological awareness, or staff appointed by various organizations, and most of them are still in party member. This legal knowledge should be there. So I also went to check the news. The fact is that the government requires the quarantined people not to lock the door, which is more convenient for household disinfection. But the owner locked the door, so the epidemic prevention personnel had no choice but to start picking the lock, and the police were there when picking the lock. Therefore, it is nonsense for epidemic prevention personnel to knock on the door and enter the house.

Second, the killing of pet dogs by epidemic prevention personnel is an infringement of private property.

First of all, you should know that since the law allows picking locks, it is not a burglary. Let's talk about killing the pet dog first. I think this thing is really wrong for epidemic prevention personnel, because without the approval of the owner, other people's pet dogs are negative and not infected with the virus. Killing the owner's pet dog without authorization is an act of infringing on private property.

Third, I hope that the relevant departments can punish the behavior of this epidemic prevention personnel.

In fact, I can understand the mood of epidemic prevention personnel. After all, COVID-19's influence is too great. Everyone wants the epidemic to pass quickly, because they are afraid that the pet dog will be infected with the virus, so they will kill it. My mood is understandable, but it is absolutely wrong. Now that I have done something wrong, I will be punished. After all, this incident has also brought bad effects. I hope the relevant departments will punish the epidemic prevention personnel.