Do you agree if the property is cancelled and turned into public welfare community service?

With the development of society, our life is getting better and better, but there are also some new problems. For example, many people don't like property. If we cancel the property and switch to public service, will you agree? Of course I won't agree, because on the one hand, I think many people will be reluctant to go to public office. Secondly, the quality of public services can not be guaranteed, which may take up too much of our time. It is better to ask the property directly and then tell you the details. 1. Public community service, many owners may not want to go.

At present, our community generally has property, and our problems are all handled by property. However, if it is replaced by public community service, at least some owners are willing to take the initiative to serve the community owners, but some owners are definitely lazy. They don't want to serve others, so everyone will have conflicts. After all, no one wants to work more. 2. There may be no way to guarantee the quality of public services.

For example, the sanitation problem in our community, if the property is not well cleaned, we can go to the property for feedback and ask them to change a group of cleaners with better quality, or improve the quality of existing cleaners, but if it is a public community service, how can we guarantee the quality of these services? Because others are public welfare, how dare you let others improve their quality? So I think there may be no way to guarantee the quality of public welfare community services. 3. Public community service may take up too much of our time, not as good as property.

Work is very busy, usually from 8 am to 8 pm, so there is almost no other time. If I am asked to serve the owners of public service, I may not have time, or I may take too much time off to serve them. For me, it is better to pay the property directly. For many owners, it is the same. I was looking for a property before because I didn't have time, so I asked the property to deal with these health problems to save time.

In a word, I think if the property is cancelled and turned into public service, I will definitely not agree, because on the one hand, the quality of public service cannot be guaranteed and the service level cannot be better improved. Secondly, I think public services may take up too much of our time, resulting in more losses than gains. It is better to hand over the property directly. Moreover, people may also have conflicts because of the management of public services.