Is the property management responsible for the owner's loss caused by the artificial opening of the fire hydrant in the corridor?

One. You should look at the property contract signed when buying a house, and whether the property staff has an agreement to inspect the house. How much is once in a while? If so, did he abide by the contract?

Two. There are no cameras on all the floors you mentioned, which is not the basis. This is something designed by the developer. You can't blame anyone for buying this house.

Three. From a legal point of view, it was that man who deliberately opened the valve, which caused the loss of your home. If the property staff does not regularly inspect the building according to the contract and find problems. The property has the responsibility, and the amount of responsibility is not my decision.

Four. If it is the responsibility of the property, the property will pay compensation (again, the court will say how much to pay). If the person who opens the valve is caught in the future, the person who opens the valve will pay full compensation.

Five. One more thing I almost forgot. Your house was flooded in the middle of the night, so someone in this building should have opened the fire damper. No one runs to open the valve in the middle of the night. But I'm not sure this will work. You'd better consult a lawyer for what I say next. I remember that if the main pipe of a building was blocked, a household was flooded. If you can't prove that you are not at fault, the losses will be borne by all the residents in this building, including the flooded residents. Do you understand what I mean?

What I said above is true. Leave me a message if you need it.

One last point: Should I get 100? Don't forget o