Who is responsible for the injury of the owner caused by the automatic door of the property?

According to the law of our country, if citizens enjoy the right to life and health and cause personal injury to citizens, they should be liable for compensation. As the manager of the community, the property management company has the obligation to ensure the safe entry and exit of people and vehicles in the community. In order to avoid being liable for compensation due to poor management, the property management company needs to clearly inform the owner of the opening time and staying time of the electric door, and post the words of safety tips at the door to remind the owner to pay attention to swiping the card when entering and leaving, and fulfill the obligation of high safety reminder. In addition, when an owner is injured due to not going in and out according to the regulations, the personnel of the property management company should take timely measures to reduce the damage consequences and send the injured to the hospital as soon as possible. Generally, the property company is responsible. Because as a property service enterprise, citizens' right to health should be protected by law, because they have not fulfilled their due management obligations. According to Article 36 of China's Property Management Regulations, property management enterprises should provide corresponding services in accordance with the provisions of the property service contract. If the property management enterprise fails to perform the property service contract, causing personal and property safety damage to the owner, it shall bear corresponding legal responsibilities according to law. Therefore, if the property management company fails to fulfill the stipulations of the property service contract in the service process and is at fault for the consequences of the owner's property loss, it shall bear corresponding legal responsibilities.

The reasonable limit of property's obligation to judge its own security can be measured and grasped from the following three angles:

First, whether the security behavior of the security obligor meets the statutory requirements;

Second, whether the security behavior of the security obligor has reached the normal level that employees of similar business activities or social activities should reach at this stage;

Third, whether the performance of the security obligation has reached the level of reasonable attention that a rational, cautious and kind person should achieve.

Legal basis: Article 36 of the Property Management Regulations stipulates that property management enterprises shall provide corresponding services in accordance with the stipulations of the property service contract. If the property management enterprise fails to perform the property service contract, causing personal and property safety damage to the owner, it shall bear corresponding legal responsibilities according to law.