Do you agree to cancel the property and implement residents' autonomy?

As an important part of improving the grade and quality of residential quarters, property was still very popular with owners of residential quarters in the past. However, with the imperfection of market economy in recent years, driven by interests, the squeezing of property to owners has become more and more serious, which has made many owners of residential quarters more and more disgusted with property. Then the problem comes, cancel the property and implement residents' autonomy. Do you agree? Today, on this issue, Herry Liu analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of canceling property and implementing residents' autonomy, and expresses his personal views, hoping to help everyone in this respect.

Why are there more and more calls to cancel the property?

First, the property fee is too high. The property fees of many communities in the market are 3445 yuan per square meter. If a house is 90 square meters, you have to pay the 270 yuan property fee and parking fee at least once a month. Even if you buy a parking space, you have to pay a management fee. The general management fee is 50 to 60 a month, and the parking fee is 300 to 400 a month. For ordinary families, such a large sum of money is still stressful and inevitable.

Second, the home was stolen, the car was scraped, the property was lost, and the property was not compensated. At present, many properties are only managed and not responsible, that is to say, they only know how to collect money and do not compensate the owners for their property losses. In case the owner damages the sentry box and needs compensation, the owner will compensate. Is there any property compensation? The socialist market economy is not responsible for its own profits and losses, and its finances are not open.

Third, the advertising business and parking fee income of the community belong to the property. Nowadays, many communities have advertising columns, especially videos of elevator locations. This is not a small income, all owned by the property. At the same time, these expenses are often not used for community maintenance, and these incomes are not publicly known to the owners' Committee.

Advantages and disadvantages of canceling property and owner autonomy

Advantages:

First, reduce property fees. Just ask cleaning, security and electricians, and other management fees can be basically cancelled; The advertising income of the community can be included in the property fee, which directly reduces the property fee of each community owner, and it should not be a problem to reduce it by 50%.

Second, financial disclosure. All aspects of the expenditure will be more clear, and every owner can know, so that corruption is not easy to occur, and mutual supervision can clearly understand the consumption (does the owner know where the money is used? )。

Disadvantages:

First, it is not easy to unify thoughts. When the forest is big, there are all kinds of birds. There are always a few different ones in each community, but they all choose to do it themselves. Some different kinds of people are likely to be arrogant, that is, they don't pay property fees. It is relatively difficult to manage the owners' committees of such people.

Second, relatively speaking, owners are more likely to "do whatever they want". Residents' autonomy is the choice for the property in the community. Just like there is no property in the community, the owners will occupy land around their living environment, but it is difficult to mediate disputes and there is no binding management department.

Third, in the case of beating, smashing and looting, the responsibility cannot be clearly drawn. Because of the choice of autonomy, the incident of beating, smashing and looting can only be solved by the owners themselves, and there are departments to investigate the responsibility, so the responsibility is not so strict.

Fourth, owners need to waste more time. Personnel recruitment, facility maintenance, material procurement, etc. All of them need to go through the owners' committee, which will easily lead to a waste of time, and the owners' committee needs to spend more energy in this respect. At the same time, the owners' committee is a department without income. After a long time, the owners' Committee will be unwilling to do so and feel thankless.

Personal opinion: Under the market economy, every unit should be responsible for its own profits and losses, but 100% of residential property agency companies will not lose money, because they have fixed income, and their fixed expenditure is far less than the fixed income, so they can make profits and will never lose money; Who doesn't want to be a department that will never lose money under the conditions of market economy? This is the reason why there is a certain contradiction between property and community owners; If a policy can be formulated to make the property self-financing and ensure the safety and interests of the owners, then no owners will want to cancel the property.