Wuhan property support

The property must be responsible for this. There is nothing to say. This is the responsibility of the property itself. This is beyond dispute. The property in this community must be responsible for this matter.

In fact, there is absolutely no need to ask this question, because the property is fully responsible for this matter. The property failed to manage the floor it was responsible for, and the wall of the floor fell off and hit the car in the net, resulting in a crash and death. The property must take full responsibility. There's nothing to say. Collecting property fees will bear the risks of these problems, so I said there is no need to ask this question at all. Moreover, this kind of similar case is not without, and the property is fully responsible every time.

One: What is this?

What happened was that the wall on the 33rd floor of Building C2 of Wuhan Central Honor fell off. When it fell, it happened to hit the passing network car, and also hit the driver in the main driver, who died on the spot. According to the media survey, the phenomenon of high-altitude parabolic in this community is very common, which occurs three times a year, but it is not a high-altitude parabolic phenomenon, because it is not man-made, it is an accident, but the property is still responsible?

Two: should the property be responsible for this?

The property must be responsible for this, and it is still fully responsible. There is nothing to say. Because the property requirements include the safety of the community, so don't say it is too high, don't check it. I watched the video of the wall falling. Obviously, as long as someone looks up, they know that this wall will fall down sooner or later. Why doesn't the property know? Property should find this problem at the first time, even if it is not found at the first time, it should also inform the public security department at the first time to block the place that may be hit by the collapsed wall, and then the collapsed wall will be demolished by professionals.

Three: What do I think of this?

For me, there is no doubt that it is the full responsibility of the property, because the property has not done its due responsibility in this matter, so it is appropriate to be responsible.