Is the property responsible for the monitoring failure of the stolen community at home?

Whether the residential property needs to be liable for compensation cannot be generalized;

First of all, it depends on whether there is a clear agreement in the property contract, property service manual and other documents that the property is responsible for the safety of the community to ensure the property safety of residents. If so, the property should be fully liable for compensation.

If there is no clear agreement in the property contract, it depends on whether the property company has fulfilled its management obligations, whether the management measures are appropriate, and whether there are management defects that lead to theft. If so, the property company should bear the liability for compensation equivalent to its fault, and the specific proportion depends on how sufficient the evidence is.

Article 35 of the Regulations on Property Management stipulates that the owners' committee shall conclude a written property service contract with the property management enterprise selected by the owners' congress. Property service contracts shall stipulate property management matters, service quality, service fees, rights and obligations of both parties, management and use of special maintenance funds, property management premises, contract term, liability for breach of contract, etc.

Article 36 stipulates that a property management enterprise shall provide corresponding services in accordance with the stipulations of the property service contract. If the property management enterprise fails to perform the property service contract, causing personal and property safety damage to the owner, it shall bear corresponding legal responsibilities according to law.