How to share the cost of installing elevators in old communities for everyone to accept?

If you live on the sixth floor, would you like to install an elevator? Same question: If you live on the first floor, would you like to install an elevator? In recent years, the contradictions caused by the installation of elevators in old communities often appear in newspapers. Both supporters and opponents tried to persuade the opposition to compromise their tragic situation, and some broke up in discord, shaking hands and fighting.

The reason is that both parties can't solve it reasonably according to the existing regulations. It seems that we haven't legislated who should compromise with whom, but then the government came up with a more compromise plan. If you want to install an elevator, you must get the consent of the owner of the whole building. The introduction of this regulation only solves the basic framework.

The fundamental point has not been solved, such as how much the beneficiary should bear after installing the elevator, such as the purchase, installation and post-maintenance costs of the elevator, and then how much compensation the losing party should get. There is neither standard nor guidance. I don't know if there are any in other cities, but we don't have them here anyway.

Let's talk about the basic process of elevator installation first. First of all, the sponsor drafts an agreement, which roughly covers the installation cost of the elevator, what brand to install and when to install it. The most important thing is how much each household has to pay. The signature shall be signed by all the owners, and then submitted to the property, community or sub-district office for approval. Often the problem is the signature, which is basically 1, and the second floor disagrees. So can they choose not to agree?

This is just like you have no reason to return goods after seven days in Taobao, because the government gave him this right. You disagree because they are the losers, that is, they have to pay the price for not enjoying the bonus. This is what many people can't see or pretend to see. Seeing this, people may think that I am waiting in line for them. First of all, I said that my home is on the fifth floor and there is no elevator. I don't want to say which side I'm on now, but I definitely support one of them.

Then let me carefully analyze what impact a building with elevators will bring to everyone. It can be divided into two directions: the top and the bottom. High-rise residents are the beneficiaries. If you don't climb the stairs, the house will appreciate, the residents at the bottom will be blocked, and the elevator will be noisy every day. The most critical house will depreciate.

Because the government has not issued relevant compensation rules, high-level residents are unwilling to compensate others, and they try to condemn them with morality. For example, there are old people in my family and children in my family, and the owners of other people's units have agreed. Why don't you agree? Anyway, I just want to get the maximum benefit at the lowest cost. I won't pretend to have a showdown.

I firmly support the residents at the bottom. There is a simple reason. I have already analyzed it for you. Installing an elevator is harmful to the ground floor. Please don't say that there are old people and children in your family. For the sake of your old people and children, I will endure noise pollution and no sunshine for the next decades or even a lifetime. I don't think this is very positive.

But I especially want to say that I am speaking from the most basic angle of human nature. After all, we live in reality, not the imaginary Noah's Ark. Your so-called positive energy is just a tool to whitewash yourself and condemn others, just like XXTV. Some people regard patriotism as a job, and the United States is life. An American mother teaches China children to love China.

The most unbearable thing is that everyone agrees, why don't you agree? This is like buying a house, and it is as shameless to ask the developer to refund the money when the house price falls. I will do what others do. As long as it is good for you, push it up desperately, and if it is not good for you, step on it crazily.

Well, today's words are a bit sharp. Having said that, there must be a solution. I have an immature suggestion that I want to share with you. First of all, the cost of installing elevators, including the cost of purchasing and installing elevators, is generally allocated according to the floor ratio of 3, 2.5, 2, 1.5 and 1.

For example, the sixth floor bears 30%, the fifth floor bears 25%, and so on. Finally, the second floor bears 10%, and the first floor does not bear any fees, so the compensation for the first floor should be based on the property price where the community is located. For example, the average price in Shenzhen is 50,000 yuan, the building area is 70 square meters, the property price is 3.5 million yuan, and the compensation is 10%.

What if the high-level residents give a price that everyone thinks is reasonable, but the bottom people are still unwilling to put it bluntly?

I think there is nothing I can do except greet his 18 ancestors in my heart. Of course, it doesn't matter where you want to go, because the government has said that unless this rule is abolished, everyone must agree. Since the government has this provision, it must have its reasons. Fortunately, whether to press the elevator is not decided according to the voting proportion.