The owner parked two cars in the parking space next to the property. Is the owner unreasonable or the property is too overbearing?

It is definitely wrong to park two cars in one parking space, which not only occupies public space, but also has potential safety hazards. This happened to a car owner in Shanghai. He bought a parking space on 20 15 with a property area of 44 square meters. The owner found that the parking space was large enough to park two cars. The owner thought that there was no provision in the original agreement that only one car could be parked in one parking space, so the owner decided to park his second car in the parking space. However, the property immediately stopped the owner. The property believes that after parking two cars in a parking space, it has exceeded the marked area, which is equivalent to occupying public space. Parking two cars in one parking space will also cause security risks. However, the owner believes that although he has exceeded the marked scope, he has not exceeded the property area of 44 square meters, so he does not occupy 44 square meters. The two sides argued constantly, and finally the owner took the property to court, demanding that the other party apologize and compensate for the parking fee of his second car.

After investigation, the court finally concluded that the property was reasonable. Property area includes pool area and can only be parked in the marked parking spaces. Beyond the marked area, it is public space, which occupies public space and poses a security threat to the residential parking lot, so the property has every right to stop it. Therefore, the court finally rejected the owner's lawsuit. However, the owner refused to accept the appeal and appealed to the Shanghai Intermediate People's Court again, but the second instance upheld the original judgment and rejected the owner's appeal again.

After this matter was reported, it also caused a heated discussion. Some netizens think that it is common sense to park a car in a parking space. Even if the area is large, you can't park two cars, and it also takes up public space. Other owners are definitely not satisfied.

References:

Mr. Yan of Shanghai bought a parking space in the community, and the property area of this parking space is 44 square meters. Mr. Yan thought it was a bit wasteful to park one car, so he parked two cars vertically on it. However, Mr. Yan's practice was obstructed by the property, arguing that Mr. Yan's practice violated the interests of other owners, and the two sides also had disputes. ?

Later, Mr. Yan took the property to court in a rage, demanding that the property no longer stop him from parking two cars, and at the same time demanding that the property compensate him for the cost of parking a second car in other places during this period. In addition, the property is required to make a written apology and post it on the bulletin board of the community for publicity.

Mr. Yan said that the property area of the parking space he bought was 44 square meters, and he stopped two cars vertically. Although the body does exceed the marked area, the actual parking area does not exceed the property area of the parking space, so it is reasonable to park by yourself. However, the property believes that the parking space should be marked, which affects the rights and interests of other owners.