The court ruled that you can still sue for delaying the delivery of the house after paying the liquidated damages in one lump sum. If the developer delays the delivery of the house after paying the li

The court ruled that you can still sue for delaying the delivery of the house after paying the liquidated damages in one lump sum. If the developer delays the delivery of the house after paying the liquidated damages, he can sue for breach of contract. The first thing you can be sure of is that you can sue again, no doubt. Let me briefly analyze the reasons.

"Never mind one thing" is a principle of civil litigation, but it refers to exactly the same "one thing", that is, there are no different contents in litigation elements such as litigation subject, legal relationship and the same object.

However, this case is not like this. Although many factors are the same, the objects of litigation are different. The object of litigation that has been decided to take effect is the controversial content in the previous litigation, and does not involve the part after the judgment (strictly speaking, it should be execution). After the execution of the previous litigation judgment, the developer still failed to fulfill the obligation to hand over the house, resulting in a new breach of contract (essentially a continuation of the previous breach of contract). However, this continued behavior was not dealt with in the previous litigation, so the consequences of continuing to breach the contract after implementation can be litigated again until the developer delivers the house.