Witness suggestions to improve the property.

Zhejiang men occupy private parking spaces, and the other side angrily challenges: whoever moves the car first is the grandson owner. When Mr. Sun drove back to the underground garage, he found that his parking space was occupied by a Buick, and his phone number had not been left on the Buick. Finally, Mr. Sun contacted the Buick owner through property security. After the Buick owner came to the underground garage, he asked Mr. Sun what was going on. You are willing to stop this, aren't you? Mr. Sun responded that you occupied my parking space. What happened? Buick owners were unmoved, claiming that they didn't see the sign of private parking space. The two men choked each other, and in the end, neither of them drove away.

Finally, Mr. Sun wrote a gauntlet to Buick owners, saying, "Whoever moves away is the grandson, don't slip from behind." Mr. Sun bluntly prepared to stop 100 days. However, the residential property that witnessed the dispute between the two stood up, and they used a forklift to transport the Buick sideways. First of all, let's talk about whether Land Rover has the right to stop Buick from coming out. According to the provisions of the Civil Code, the property rights of civil subjects are protected by law, and no person or organization may infringe upon them. As this parking space was purchased by Mr. Sun, it is the property of Mr. Sun, and no one has the right to use it without Mr. Sun's consent. It is obviously wrong for Buick owners to openly occupy it.

Mr. Sun, the owner of the parking space, has the right to demand that the obstruction be removed immediately, and has the right to ask Buick owners to pay the fees for unauthorized use of the parking space. Before Buick owners pay compensation, Mr. Sun obviously has the right to stop the car. This is the right of self-help given to citizens by law. However, any right should be exercised within a certain range and cannot be exercised indefinitely. Faced with this problem, Mr. Sun can temporarily block traffic, but not indefinitely for a long time, otherwise he will be suspected of abusing his power.

The Buick owner who handled the property occupied someone else's parking space for a period of time. The problem that could have been solved by an apology, because he refused to repent, intensified the contradiction into a mutually damaging scene, which harmed others and made people angry. Here, we need to praise the practice of the property. When the two owners are deadlocked, the property will move the Buick with a forklift at this time, which is equivalent to giving the two owners a step and avoiding the further escalation of the contradiction between the two sides. What do friends think of the behavior of Buick owners?