Is it illegal to force the installation of the National Anti-Fraud Center app?

The National Anti-Fraud Center app can effectively remind residents and friends of the common types of fraud, and can also identify fraudulent phone calls, which is a kind of protection for residents' property. Although it is unreasonable for residential property to download the National Anti-Fraud Center app, it does not violate the bottom line of the law, let alone violate the law. If you have any objection to the behavior of the residential property, you can directly report to the police or bring a lawsuit to the court. In addition, if the street office is forced to download the app, it can report the situation to the higher government or file an administrative reconsideration on the behavior of the street office.

The police forced the installation of the APP, which may be the national anti-fraud center and should cooperate.

Since it is required by the police, it can be installed, and it is all installed by the police, and there will be no viruses and the like.

The National Anti-Fraud Center is a synthetic operational platform for the the State Council Inter-Ministerial Joint Conference on Combating and Governing New Crimes in Telecommunication Networks. It integrates resource integration, intelligence research and investigation and command, and plays an important role in cracking down on and preventing new illegal crimes such as telecommunication network fraud.

As the authoritative publishing platform of the National Anti-Fraud Center, the official government number is an important measure for the Ministry of Public Security to conscientiously implement the online mass line, further contact with the masses, give a good voice to the public security, and promote the deep integration and development of the public security organs' media.

The official government number of the National Anti-Fraud Center will take various forms, such as police preaching, police-citizen interaction, network sitcoms, public service videos, arrest records and so on. , regularly update the publicity content, issue anti-fraud warning in time, and will release a series of short dramas one after another to expose and criticize the recent high-frequency behaviors such as online lending, online brushing, "killing pig dishes", impersonating customer service refund, impersonating acquaintances, impersonating "public security law", "stock recommendation" and false shopping.

Article 266 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) stipulates that whoever defrauds public or private property in a relatively large amount shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or public surveillance, and shall also or only be fined; If the amount is huge or there are other serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years and shall also be fined; If the amount is especially huge or there are other especially serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years or life imprisonment, and shall also be fined or confiscated. Where there are other provisions in this Law, such provisions shall prevail. Explanations of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Laws in Handling Criminal Cases of Fraud Article 1 Whoever commits fraud by using telecommunication network technology and defrauds public or private property in an amount of more than 3,000 yuan, more than 30,000 yuan and more than 500,000 yuan shall be deemed as "a large amount", "a huge amount" and "a particularly huge amount" as stipulated in Article 266 of the Criminal Law respectively.

Legal basis:

Article 6 of the Administrative Reconsideration Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) is under any of the following circumstances, citizens, legal persons or other organizations may apply for administrative reconsideration in accordance with this Law:

(a) refuses to accept the administrative punishment decisions made by the administrative organ, such as warning, fine, confiscation of illegal income, confiscation of illegal property, order to suspend production or business, temporary suspension or revocation of license, temporary suspension or revocation of license, administrative detention, etc. ;

(2) Refusing to accept administrative compulsory measures such as restricting personal freedom or sealing up, distraining or freezing property made by administrative organs;

(3) Refusing to accept the decision made by the administrative organ to change, suspend or revoke the license, license, qualification certificate and other documents;

(4) Refusing to accept the decision of the administrative organ to confirm the ownership or use right of natural resources such as land, mineral deposits, water, forests, mountains, grasslands, wasteland, beaches and sea areas;

(five) that the administrative organ has infringed upon the legitimate right to operate independently;

(six) the administrative organ changes or cancels the agricultural contract, which infringes upon its legitimate rights and interests;

(seven) that the administrative organs illegally raise funds, collect property, apportion expenses or illegally require other obligations;

(eight) that meets the statutory conditions, apply for administrative organs to issue permits, licenses, qualification certificates, qualification certificates and other documents, or apply for administrative organs to examine and approve and register related matters, and the administrative organs fail to handle them according to law;

(nine) apply to the administrative organ to perform the statutory duties of protecting personal rights, property rights and the right to education, and the administrative organ fails to perform them according to law;

(ten) to apply for an administrative organ to issue a pension, social insurance premium or minimum living allowance according to law, and the administrative organ fails to issue it according to law;

(eleven) that other specific administrative acts of administrative organs infringe upon their legitimate rights and interests.