The house on the top floor has just lived for half a year and found that the top floor is leaking. What compensation should I ask the developer for?

First of all, it depends on whether the main structure of the house is damaged. If it is identified by relevant parties that there are quality problems in the main structure of the house, the buyers can apply to the project quality supervision unit for re-approval. After verification, if the quality of the main structure is really unqualified, the buyer has the right to return the house; If losses are caused to the purchaser, the developer shall be liable for compensation.

After identification, it is found that there are quality problems in the non-main structure. If there is a special agreement between the two parties in the house purchase contract, such agreement shall prevail; If there is no special agreement between the two parties, it is generally impossible to check out. However, the developer should bear the warranty responsibility according to the agreement in the "Residential Quality Guarantee".

What quality problems can I check out:

1. If the owner is verified by the engineering quality supervision unit that the quality of the main structure is indeed unqualified, the buyer has the right to reject the house, terminate the commercial house sales contract and demand the developer to compensate for the losses.

? 2. The main quality of the house purchased by the owner is qualified, but other quality problems of the house seriously affect the normal living and use. The developer shall bear the liability for breach of contract, and the buyer may request to terminate the contract and compensate for the losses. "Seriously affecting the normal use of the house" generally refers to the situation that the house purchased by the buyer has serious quality problems, and the quality problems can not guarantee the personal and property safety of the buyer and the normal use of the house after being repaired.

? 3. If the house purchased by the owner has quality problems, it has not yet reached the severity of "seriously affecting normal living and use". In this case, the developer slightly breached the contract, which did not reach the level of fundamental breach of contract, and the owner could not ask to cancel the contract and return the house. Only the developer can be required to bear the maintenance responsibility during the warranty period. If the developer refuses or delays the maintenance within a reasonable period of time, the owner may maintain it by himself or entrust others to maintain it, and the maintenance expenses and other losses caused during the maintenance period shall be borne by the developer.