"The owners' committee has destroyed too many parks" is exactly "thieves shout to catch thieves"

From 20 17 to 20 18, the article "owners' committee destroyed too many parks" continued to spread among some people. "China people don't objectively evaluate the rationality of things, but only take whether their personal interests are satisfied as the standard", "too many community owners have been destroyed by the excessive rights protection of the industry Committee" and "more than 90% of them want to join the industry Committee with a sharp head" all have ulterior personal purposes.

In this regard, there have been many comments for more than a year, such as "Is it really the owners' committee that destroyed the community?" From the perspective of property peers, it is believed that this article lacks the ability of introspection and comes from the mentality of finding scapegoats, because the industry Committee cannot "control" the overall property management power of the community, and the community can be chaotic. The focus is on the property company itself: people who have no open and transparent attitude, are biased and will question criticism.

From the owner's point of view, from the point of view of a community where the industry committee and the property management company live in harmony, or from the point of view that the industry committee "holds the power of property management", the article "The owners' committee destroyed too many parks" is full of mistakes and omissions.

First of all, as for the first argument that "China people only take their personal interests to be satisfied", it is such China people who have created a high degree of trust and cooperation between strangers, and Taobao online shopping is enough to prove the fallacy of this argument. There are many swindlers in one field, which reflects not human nature, but institutional structure;

Secondly, "too many communities" have been "destroyed", and industry committees and owners are victims rather than perpetrators. Only after various sharp contradictions such as housing quality, fire safety, elevator safety and property service quality appear in the community can there be space and soil for the "super power" of the industry Committee;

Third, "more than 90% of the members have ulterior personal purposes and reasons." The so-called personal purpose is nothing more than fame and fortune. At present, most communities in China are under the responsibility of property management companies. To meet personal goals from the perspective of interests, one is to "confuse the audience" and the other is to confront property, at the cost that not only individuals but also family members' personal property may be threatened, and its "cost performance" is really worrying; From the perspective of reputation, members of the industry Committee are more likely to encounter intensive rumors and smears. Many community party and government public officials work in industry committees, and most of them voluntarily resign, which is rare.

Look carefully again, The Owners' Committee Destroys Too Many Gardens lists eight purposes and reasons of "more than 90% members": the number one reason for the owners' arrears has been excluded from the industry Committee by the Regulations of Shenzhen Special Zone; The second reason is that "paranoia" and "demanding" are equivalent to saying "all bad people", and the causal logic is disordered; The third reason is the project quality of developers, and property intervention is precisely because of the lack of service orientation for owners and confusion with developers; The fourth reason is the administrative department (illegal law enforcement, public security, water and electricity). Property should indeed bear limited liability, and the degree of investigation should have complete market rights from ignoring to rejecting; The reason for wanting to ask for a fee reduction or job search from the property on the 5th and 6th just proves that the root of the problem lies in the private management of the property company rather than the public management of the owners' meeting; No.6 wants to share the income of the public privately, and the income of the public is not guaranteed. Most of them have been occupied by the property before, and there is no guarantee that they will be owned by * * *. Reason 7: I or my relatives want to participate in property management, mainly for a few "self-managed" communities, which violates the basic common sense that owners can ask property companies to manage themselves, and people who "participate in property management" should not be regarded as "bad people"; No.8 colluded with a black property company that specializes in robbing second-hand properties, and the huge crimes covered less than 1% of the communities in Shenzhen every year at most. In fact, most of the newly rented properties in these communities in Shenzhen are famous brands, not "black properties".

The article "Owners Committee Destroys Too Many Parks" is rooted in denying "China people" and humanity. It is "hidden" to accuse "more than 90% members" for reasons such as "decent and just people will not join the industry Committee" and "too many communities have been destroyed", which is unfounded.

For the eight false reasons listed in this paper, the solution is to let the open and transparent sunshine shine into the community, to restore the property to the service provider rather than the family members, to let the owners' meeting be truly and effectively established, to give play to the decisive role of the market in resource allocation, and to establish the premise for solving the problems of residential engineering and property service quality. On this basis, the executive body of the industry Committee will also be put into the cage of the system to promote its standardized operation.

20 18 July18 in the natural residence.

Attached is the original text of "Owners Committee Destroys Too Many Parks":

Reason is a rare quality, and impulsiveness will lead to bad results in most cases.

The system of owners' committee and owners' assembly was introduced from Hong Kong and abroad, but there are no large parks with thousands of households like Chinese mainland in foreign countries and Hong Kong, and the quality of domestic owners is not as good as that in foreign countries, so the public welfare is not strong. Ten people can have eight attitudes towards an event, but China people don't objectively evaluate the rationality of things, only take whether their personal interests are met as the standard, so it is not suitable for excessive democracy at all. The system of owners' assembly and owners' committee is not suitable for Chinese mainland at all. Too many parks are controlled by individual owners' committees, too many parks are destroyed by owners' excessive rights protection, and too many parks have changed from the original garden closed community to open-air garbage dumps. The depreciation of the house is the biggest loss for the owners, but it is impossible to hold the owners' committee responsible: the management of a park must be supervised by the relevant government departments through honesty, and it is impossible to rely on the owner's autonomy or several members of the industry Committee;

When the owners' committee was established, 90% of the people who beheaded into the owners' committee were for the following purposes and reasons (while those who were decent and upright would not join the industry committee if they begged others):

* Long-term arrears of property fees, only the obligation to enjoy services. I was sued by the property, commonly known as Lao Lai, and I tried my best to be a member of the industry Committee against the property;

* paranoid in all aspects of life, unable to understand the normal problems in property management, demanding that the property be perfect, although not perfect in all aspects, leading to misunderstandings and doubts about property management;

* The developer's legacy of engineering quality problems is not solved, blaming the property management company, which leads to extreme emotions towards the property management company;

* Impose the responsibilities of administrative departments (administrative law enforcement, public security, water supply, power supply, heating and other departments) on the property management company, and resent the property if it cannot be solved;

* I don't have a proper job or a stable income, and I want to ask the property company for various benefits or ask for a reduction in property fees by becoming a member of the industry Committee;

* Want to share the public benefits of the park or get a salary from the property company;

* Some industry committee members or their relatives wish to participate in property management;

* With criminals who specialize in grabbing second-hand property and property companies involved in the black market (most of these companies grab property in black and white, and say hello to the owners who normally defend their rights after entering the park, keeping silent), so as to achieve the purpose of harming others and benefiting themselves. Now, some full-time property companies have promised to the industry committee that as long as they cooperate successfully, the total property fee will be divided into four or six parts with the industry committee. Some companies rob the market and pay large bribes to the owners' committee to buy a car for the director of the industry committee. Some industry committee directors will charge 50,000 meeting fees when they meet any property company that wants to take over when the property contract in the park is about to expire.

They seized the hearts of most owners who didn't care about the property and didn't know the inside story, and deprived them of their right to know. Finally, they introduced the property into the park through false propaganda, confusing the audience, irregular procedures and fraudulent voting. The purpose of these companies is not to serve the owners well and have no sense of social responsibility. It's all about quick success and instant benefit. Finally, when most owners reacted, it was too late to regret it. Because the property changed hands, the house was in a mess, notorious, the equipment was damaged, and finally depreciated.

It should be said that most property companies still want to do a good job in property, and there is no impeccable service industry in the world. Due to the traditional culture of China, it is difficult for honest officials to break housework, so at present, the property industry has become the most difficult industry to do. If there is anything wrong with the property, it is, after all, an enterprise. As individuals, members of the industry committee are not bound by relevant laws, representing the interests of the owners and having their own private interests. After many members of the industry Committee got the benefits, they saw that the park was in chaos and sold their houses and ran away!