Thoughts on watching the movie "Anger of Man"

I have nothing to do at the weekend. I watched the movie "Human Wrath". I want to watch "The Lord of the Rings-The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King". Because of the high score, the Lord of the Rings took too long to find the right time, so I chose Wrath of Man.

This movie is starring Jason Statham, which is the main reason why I chose to watch this movie. This is a very capable role.

The film tells the story of a heavily armed armored car robbery. Mei Sen's son, played by Stanson, was killed by robbers as a witness. Angry Mace became H undercover and became the security guard of the armored car, trying to find out the robber who killed his son and the mole who colluded with the robber in the security company.

There was no accident in the film, and it was still dominated by gun battles. Unexpectedly, the protagonist is not a standard kind and upright person like the protagonist in the movies he used to watch, but a vengeful person who never shows mercy or even cruelty to the enemy.

I don't know if it's because of time constraints or something. I always feel that some plots have not been fully unfolded, and I still have some doubts after watching the movie.

First, the identity of the starring role.

According to the film description, the hero should have two identities, and both identities are mysterious.

The first identity is the leader of a robbery gang, and the reason why his son was killed was to help his own robbery gang. So legally speaking, a star should be a criminal, which is absolutely impossible in domestic movies and TV series, and no one in the movie knows the identity of the star from beginning to end.

The second identity is more mysterious, without any information, which can only be felt by the audience. The protagonist in the play comes into contact with a mysterious figure, who feels like a senior government official or the head of a mysterious organization.

The mysterious character only appeared twice in the whole play. The first meeting to talk about the protagonist's revenge shows that the protagonist can take revenge in his own way. It can be seen that the identity of the other party is powerful. The second meeting was after the protagonist killed the enemy in his own way, one of them left the crime scene and the other entered the crime scene.

Two completely confused and overlapping identities are placed on one person. I always feel that there should be a more tortuous story in it, but the film does not describe it.

Second, the protagonist's resilience is super strong.

Yi * *, the protagonist in the film, has been seriously injured twice.

The first time, after his son was killed by robbers, the protagonist ran forward and was shot by robbers. When I woke up in the hospital, I was told that I had been shot several times.

But the protagonist is the protagonist after all, wearing the aura of the protagonist, and soon entered the role of revenge for his son. That's understandable. After all, the cause and effect are introduced, and the scene of the protagonist in the hospital shows that the protagonist's recovery is treated.

The second injury was when the robbers robbed the bank warehouse, and the gun battle was very fierce. The protagonist even fell to the ground after being shot. At that time, his face was covered with blood, but in a blink of an eye, it was only at night that the protagonist appeared intact in the robber's residence, but his legs were slightly tilted without any explanation. This change is really confusing for Zhang Er and monks.

Third, the ending of the protagonist

Judging from the ending, the protagonist should have a good ending. Revenge for yourself and get away with it. From the perspective of the protagonist's revenge for his son, the story is over.

But judging from the whole film, the story is obviously incomplete, and the robbers, including the protagonist, have not explained it. It feels like watching a movie cut from beginning to end.