How to quickly distinguish arguments from arguments

There are generally four modules of judgment reasoning in the provincial national examination, namely: graphic reasoning, definition judgment, analogical reasoning and logical judgment. Among them, the general number of logical judgment is 10, which is quite difficult. Therefore, in order to solve problems with targeted skills, we divide logical judgment into several small questions, which account for the largest number of questions and make students extremely puzzled. In the process of examination, there are two major difficulties in doing argumentative essay questions: first, there are too many written discussions, and candidates will waste a lot of time reading questions and options; The other is that the difference in options is relatively small, and candidates are easily confused. Therefore, under the premise of pursuing speed and accuracy, we need to learn to slice the questions when doing arguments, and first understand the topics and events discussed in the problem-solving work, so as to find the options in a targeted manner. This requires us to find arguments and arguments quickly when doing argumentative questions, and then distinguish options according to the different characteristics of arguments and arguments, so that we will be more handy and have higher accuracy in the process of doing questions.

Next, I will share some quick ways to distinguish arguments from arguments to help you win the argument. I hope it will help you. To correctly analyze the argumentation topic, we must learn to distinguish between arguments and arguments, and we can follow the following points:

(1) Find a clear object by asking questions. Lock the independent variable directly in the stem according to the object.

For a long time, scientists have been looking for the answer to a question, that is, what gives the earth enough oxygen to breed animals and humans. Oxygen appeared in the earth's atmosphere 2.4 billion years ago. About 470 million years ago, bryophytes spread rapidly on the earth, and it was not until 400 million years ago that the oxygen content in the earth's atmosphere reached today's level. Therefore, some scientists believe that a large increase in oxygen on the earth comes from moss ground cover plants.

If correct, which of the following can best support the views of the above scientists?

This question directly gives a clear object in the question, asking the scientist's point of view, so you can know what the argument of this question is by positioning the scientist's point of view directly in the stem of the question, that is? Does the earth's oxygen surge come from moss ground cover plants? We have solved most of the problems by analyzing the sources of the massive increase of oxygen on the earth.

(2) find keywords. Usually? So what? 、? So what? 、? So what? 、? It's obvious? 、? What does this mean? 、? Anyway? The sentence after the conjunction is an argument, but in? Because? 、? Hypothetically? 、? Because? 、? Since? The sentence after the conjunction is an argument. What else is there? Declare? 、? Think? 、? Explain? 、? Suggestion? 、? Speculation? The sentence after the word indicating the conclusion may be an argument, such as? What is the reason? 、? What is the basis? 、? Like what? Subsequent reports, etc. Usually it's an argument.

For example, as the temperature rises, the probability that the tropical rain forest will be struck by lightning and cause a fire will also increase. However, the current monitoring shows that although American rainforests are struck by lightning more frequently, it has not caused more forest fires. Researchers believe that this may be related to the large increase of vines in the rainforest in recent years.

If correct, which of the following can best support the above conclusion?

After you get the question, lock the keyword directly and it will appear? Researchers think? The key word followed by the argument is that although the forest fire was struck by lightning, the reason was the increase of vines in the rainforest. Therefore, students must remember these keywords, be sensitive when they meet in the topic, find the argument accurately, and analyze the topics discussed in the topic.

(3) Causality analysis. When there are no hints or multiple hints in the stem, candidates can distinguish arguments from arguments by analyzing the causal relationship in the stem.

Theft cases often occur in a residential area. At the request of residents, the property installed a multifunctional anti-theft system for the community at the beginning of last year. As a result, the incidence of theft cases in the community has obviously decreased, which shows that the multifunctional anti-theft system can effectively reduce the incidence of theft cases.

Which of the following, if true, can best strengthen the above conclusion?

There are many key words in this question, which are arguments and arguments? Students can analyze through cause and effect. Because with the installation of the anti-theft system, the incidence of theft cases has decreased, which shows that the anti-theft system is effective. Prove an argument with an argument, find an argument quickly, and then analyze the options to find an accurate answer.

I hope these methods can help you, and I wish you success in landing!