The drunk climbed the ninth floor and tried to fall into his girlfriend's house. The family's property claim was rejected by the court. How to interpret this matter?

The fault of this matter does not belong to the negligence of property management, so the family claim is not recognized.

In this incident, the main person responsible for the accident is the drunk himself, so those who drink with the drunk should also bear certain legal responsibilities. Property can manage all security-related affairs in the community, but it can't control whether the owner climbs the window. In addition, when the relevant departments inspected the door and window protection measures at the scene of the incident, they found that there was no fault in the safety prevention and control of the property, and preventive measures were taken for foreseeable risks, so the property did not need to bear any responsibility. Moreover, according to the law of our country, if a man drinks at a party organized by others, then the organizer has the obligation to send the drunken man home safely, and in this case, the man went home alone, which shows that the organizer has certain responsibilities.

In addition, when a drunk goes home and his girlfriend is not in the house for the time being, he can contact his girlfriend to open the door, or wait in place and choose to climb the stairs to enter the house, which in itself violates the needs of social security. If the owner of the house is his girlfriend, and the other party doesn't want to let the drunk enter, then his attempt to climb over the wall is burglary, even if he doesn't die, he needs to bear the corresponding legal responsibility. To sum up, this man's death was entirely caused by his own misconduct.

In this case, drunken people, as adults, must be responsible for their actions. He should also have a clear understanding of the risks of climbing the wall, but he took risks and did great harm to himself and his family. I'm really sorry. I hope that netizens can learn from it. Before doing anything, they should evaluate whether their actions are reasonable and dangerous, and be prepared to bear all legal responsibilities for their actions.