Division of responsibility for the safety of group fighting property

The Supreme People's Court "on the trial.

Personal injury compensation case

Article 8 of the Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law stipulates: "If the legal representative, responsible person or staff of a legal person or other organization causes damage to others in the course of performing their duties, the legal person or other organization shall bear civil liability in accordance with the provisions of Article 12 1 of the General Principles of Civil Law. If the above-mentioned personnel commit acts unrelated to their duties and cause damage to others, the perpetrator shall be liable for compensation. "

Therefore, whether the property management company should bear the responsibility or the security guard should bear the responsibility depends on whether the dispute between the security guard and you occurred in the course of performing their duties. In this dispute, the security guard is arguing with you about the puppy peeing. Obviously, this security guard is performing the management and service duties entrusted by the property management company, which is obviously related to his position. It is incorrect for property companies to think that security guards are temporary workers and individuals should bear the responsibility. Whether the security guard is a temporary worker or a regular worker is the content of the labor relationship between the property management company and the security guard, which has nothing to do with you. Therefore, as long as the security guards push you down in the process of carrying out the task, the property company will be liable for compensation.