Did the nanny arson victim sue the fire department?

On June 25, the Intermediate People's Court of Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province officially released a briefing on the case that Lin Shengbin and other three defendants were told about the dispute over the right to life of Greentown Property Service Group Co., Ltd., and ruled that Lin Shengbin and other three defendants were dismissed from the civil lawsuit against Hangzhou Public Security Fire Bureau.

According to the circular, on May 2, 20654381day, Lin Shengbin, Zhu Hengren and Xu Meizhi take Greentown Property Service Group Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Greentown Haiqi Industrial Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Public Security Fire Bureau, China Construction Third Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Greentown Oriental Architectural Design Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Zhongxing Engineering Construction Supervision Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Zhu 'an Construction Group Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Huaan Fire Technology Service Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Yang Chen Home Economics Service Co., Ltd. as defendants. A civil lawsuit was filed to order the nine defendants to compensate the dependents for death compensation, funeral expenses, transportation expenses and living expenses totaling 23,557,440.8 yuan, property losses of 4/kloc-0,000,000 yuan and mental damages of 80 million yuan, and to apologize.

According to the circular, on May 28th, our hospital informed Sanyuan of the pre-litigation mediation, litigation risks, and correction of prosecution materials according to law; At the same time, in view of the fact that the fire fighting and rescue behavior carried out by Hangzhou Public Security Fire Bureau is not a civil act, it is suggested that the three plaintiffs withdraw their civil prosecution against Hangzhou Public Security Fire Bureau. After explanation, Sanyuan Gao disagreed with the withdrawal of the lawsuit. According to the spirit of filing registration system in the Supreme People's Court, our hospital decided to accept it together.

The circular also pointed out that after filing the case, our hospital believed that the fire fighting and rescue actions carried out by Hangzhou Public Security Fire Bureau according to relevant laws and regulations were not civil actions, and there was no civil legal relationship between Sanyuanbao and Hangzhou Public Security Fire Bureau due to fire fighting and rescue actions. Sanyuan sued Hangzhou Public Security Fire Bureau for civil compensation liability on the grounds that it was at fault in fire fighting and rescue, which is not within the scope of civil litigation accepted by the people's court according to law. On June 25th, after being explained again by our hospital, Sanyuan Gao still refused to withdraw the lawsuit, so our hospital ruled to dismiss its civil lawsuit against Hangzhou Public Security Fire Bureau.