Job Recruitment Website - Property management company - Why did Lin Shengbin, the family member of nanny arson, sue the fire department?

Why did Lin Shengbin, the family member of nanny arson, sue the fire department?

On June 25th, according to the notification of Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court: 2065438+May 2nd, 20081day, Lin Shengbin, Zhu Hengren, Xu Meizhi took Greentown Property Service Group Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Greentown Haiqi Industrial Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Public Security Fire Bureau, China Construction Third Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Greentown Oriental Architectural Design Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Zhongxing Engineering Construction Supervision Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Zhu 'an Construction Group Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Huaan Fire Technology Service Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Yang Chen demanded that the nine defendants be ordered to compensate for death compensation, funeral expenses, transportation expenses, The dependents' living expenses totaled 23,557,440.8 yuan, the property loss was 4 1 million yuan, and the mental damages were 80 million yuan, and they apologized.

On May 28th, our hospital informed Sanyuan about the pre-litigation mediation, litigation risks and the correction of prosecution materials. At the same time, in view of the fact that the fire fighting and rescue behavior carried out by Hangzhou Public Security Fire Bureau is not a civil act, it is suggested that the three plaintiffs withdraw their civil prosecution against Hangzhou Public Security Fire Bureau. After explanation, Sanyuan Gao disagreed with the withdrawal of the lawsuit. According to the spirit of filing registration system in the Supreme People's Court, our hospital decided to accept it together.

After the case was put on file, our hospital believed that the fire fighting and rescue actions carried out by Hangzhou Public Security Fire Bureau according to relevant laws and regulations were not civil acts, and there was no civil legal relationship between Sanyuanbao and Hangzhou Public Security Fire Bureau. Sanyuan sued Hangzhou Public Security Fire Bureau for civil compensation liability on the grounds that it was at fault in fire fighting and rescue, which is not within the scope of civil litigation accepted by the people's court according to law. On June 25th, after being explained again by our hospital, Sanyuan Gao still refused to withdraw the lawsuit, so our hospital ruled to dismiss its civil lawsuit against Hangzhou Public Security Fire Bureau.