Hefei's response to people in epidemic areas can be aboveboard. What does this bring to national epidemic prevention?

Relevant personnel in Hefei responded that people in epidemic areas can come to Hefei aboveboard, which has brought the following enlightenment to the national epidemic prevention:

Enlighten people that rigid epidemic prevention and control policies are not desirable. Many areas will formulate a series of epidemic prevention and control policies after the outbreak, some of which are aimed at the isolation of local people at home, and some are aimed at the epidemic prevention and control policies of mainlanders coming to the region. For example, workers in Shanghai are stopped or persuaded to return when they return to their hometown, because the epidemic in Shanghai will bring certain risks to the local area. Such an epidemic prevention and control policy is too rigid and rigid, and adopting a one-size-fits-all policy can not bring effective results to epidemic prevention and control. Only in the epidemic risk areas that have been strictly examined at epidemic prevention and control points, the incoming personnel should check the 24-hour nucleic acid test certificate and health code test, and they can enter the low-risk areas as long as they meet the requirements, instead of adopting a lazy policy.

It reveals that the epidemic prevention and control policy is ultimately for people, not limited to people. The epidemic has come, and various epidemic prevention and control policies have been introduced one after another. In the final analysis, it is to serve the people, for the health and safety of people, and for the safety of people's travel. If we only treat the epidemic prevention and control rules as simple epidemic prevention and control, and control the epidemic in order to control the epidemic, it will have a negative impact on the general residents. After the outbreak of epidemic in some areas, refusing to return to the epidemic area violates the original intention of the prevention and control policy in principle and fails to thoroughly implement the prevention and control policy of dynamic zero clearing.

It is revealed that epidemic prevention and control policies should be formulated according to different risk levels. For example, in some cities in Henan province, no matter what level of risk is outside the province, even in low-risk areas, it is still necessary to do nucleic acid testing and 7-day home isolation when coming to the province. According to the normal epidemic prevention and control policy, people in low-risk areas only need to detect the health code, and do not need to be isolated at home. Obviously, there is no flexible epidemic prevention and control policy according to risk level.