Is it fair to pay 60% of the property fee to the householder and 40% to the property management company?

Is fair. According to what you said, it should refer to an idle house. After all, if you have a place to live, you are usually charged in full. It is fair to charge 60% of the property fee to the owners of idle houses for the following reasons:

From the perspective of the property management company, I definitely hope to collect it in full. Regardless of whether the tenants can't live, all kinds of property management have to be carried out as usual, such as:

1. No matter how high the vacancy rate is, security guards and cleaning staff must be equipped normally;

2. When cleaning the corridor, you can't always clean it selectively, so you should avoid the corridor of vacant houses.

If thieves break into these empty rooms, it is impossible to leave them unattended.

Moreover, if there is no property fee for vacant houses, it will inevitably reduce the income of the property, increase the cost of the property, and even lead to losses, thus affecting the property management of the whole community.

From this perspective, although these vacant house owners have not moved in, they have actually been enjoying the property services.

It is also appropriate to pay a certain percentage of property fees. As for the owners, their houses are vacant, they don't live, don't stop, don't use elevators, don't produce garbage and so on. It is really unreasonable for them to pay the property fee in full, but it is reasonable and acceptable to pay 60% of the property fee.