Plus media comments: don't push the responsibility to the grassroots.

After the incident was exposed by the media, the superior of the street criticized the residential property "should not be overweight". For this example, we are not "crying out" for residential properties and neighborhood committees, nor are we simply criticizing streets, but we want to discuss with you how to really eliminate the phenomenon of "layer upon layer overweight" in epidemic prevention and control. We must first make clear why there is "layer upon layer plus code". The masses have complaints and opinions about "increasing the number of floors", and problems often occur at the grassroots level. In reality, all kinds of "layers of overweight" problems, grassroots staff will not be invisible, ignorant, and will not have no opinions. Opposing "layer upon layer plus code" must reduce the burden on the grassroots; To reduce the burden on the grassroots, it is necessary for the superior leaders to take responsibility. At the same time, however, cadres at all levels should also put themselves in the shoes of the masses, reduce the pressure on the grassroots, and put an end to "overweight at different levels" from their own level.

Media comments are overweight: don't push the responsibility to the grassroots. Come and have a look with me.

Recently, although some cities have lifted the control of residential areas, the side doors of residential areas have been delayed. Residents look for property and the property is pushed to the neighborhood Committee. Neighborhood committees say "listen to the street" and street cadres say "wait for instructions from superiors". After the incident was exposed by the media, the superior of the street criticized the residential property "should not be overweight". However, the property and neighborhood committees have grievances: "We have asked for instructions many times and have not got a clear answer." A situation like this is not a case.

For this example, we are not "crying out" for residential properties and neighborhood committees, nor are we simply criticizing streets, but we want to discuss with you how to really eliminate the phenomenon of "layer upon layer overweight" in epidemic prevention and control.

We must first make clear why there is "layer upon layer plus code". The masses have complaints and opinions about "increasing the number of floors", and problems often occur at the grassroots level. Is it the manager (staff) of a residential area, or the manager (staff) of a commercial building, shopping mall and crossing that subjectively and strongly demands "checks at all levels"?

The answer is obviouslyno. Many grassroots workers exposed to "one size fits all" and excessive prevention and control seem to be responsible, but they are actually afraid of taking responsibility. For example, the superior stipulates that nucleic acid should be done before entering public places, so no matter which position the staff is, it will be strictly enforced. They are not indifferent to the opinions of the masses, but more worried. If they let it go easily, who will be responsible in the end?

For another example, the superior stipulates that in case of emergency patients, nucleic acid must be done first and then rescued, otherwise they are not allowed to enter the treatment room? Obviously, there is no such superior regulation. However, whether it is hospital security or 120, why do they have so much power to shirk their responsibilities or even "lose their reputation"? Did they misunderstand the rules of their superiors, or did they have "hints" although they didn't have "clear words"? Maybe not.

In reality, all kinds of "layers of overweight" problems, grassroots staff will not be invisible, ignorant, and will not have no opinions. But you saw it. Why didn't you object and stop it? The answer lies in the distribution of responsibilities.

Opposing "layer upon layer plus code" must reduce the burden on the grassroots; To reduce the burden on the grassroots, it is necessary for the superior leaders to take responsibility. In other words, leading cadres and staff at all levels should shoulder the corresponding responsibilities, and they can't push all the responsibilities to the grassroots and press them "below".

What needs to be emphasized here is that the "dynamic clearing" of epidemic prevention and control is not necessarily related to the "layer by layer overweight". Adhering to dynamic zero clearing is not only the inevitable requirement of adhering to people-oriented and life-first, but also the concrete embodiment of respecting science and law; And "layer by layer plus code" is contrary to the above purpose.

Epidemic prevention and control work is the touchstone to test a leading cadre's sense of responsibility. Judging from the actual situation, most cadres dare to take responsibility and earnestly perform their responsibilities and duties. Like grass-roots staff, they are also very hard, so we should give them some consideration and understanding. At the same time, however, cadres at all levels should also put themselves in the shoes of the masses, reduce the pressure on the grassroots, and put an end to "overweight at different levels" from their own level.