Is the property responsible for replacing broken glass?

Legal analysis: the property is generally irresponsible, and the glass in the household belongs to private property, not to the public facilities in the community, so the property is generally irresponsible. After the glass is broken, it is necessary to analyze the cause of the glass breakage, whether it is the quality of the glass, force majeure or man-made damage. If it is man-made destruction, the saboteur shall bear the responsibility.

Legal basis: Article 942 of the Civil Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) stipulates that the property service provider shall, in accordance with the agreement and the nature of the use of the property, properly repair, maintain, clean, afforest and manage some owners in the property service area, maintain the basic order of the property service area, and take reasonable measures to protect the personal and property safety of the owners. Property service providers shall take timely and reasonable measures to stop acts that violate laws and regulations such as public security, environmental protection and fire protection in the property service area, report to the relevant administrative departments and assist in handling them.