Should the property be responsible for the damage to the goods in the store?

Light box in front of shop of property management company ..

Look at the ownership of this light box. Belonging to the public part, it belongs to the property company for maintenance. The light box shop belonging to the shop repairs it by itself. If it is a municipal lamp, it will be handled by the municipal government.

According to the landlord's description, it is obvious that the light box was damaged artificially, and it is suspected that the property did not fulfill its management duties. The job responsibilities of the property include maintaining equipment and facilities, maintaining public order, etc ... excluding keeping goods in special areas. Unless the landlord collects evidence that the property management company failed to fulfill its security obligations in the property service contract on the night of the incident, the light box at the door was artificially damaged because the property security service did not meet the contract standards. But even if this kind of evidence is collected, it only proves that the property has not fulfilled its responsibilities, and it cannot prove that the goods are damaged and the property is directly responsible. It is difficult to satisfy the claim.

It is recommended to buy real estate insurance.