Is it illegal for retired police officers to wear police uniforms to forcibly collect property fees for a shopping mall?

1. Can I wear a police uniform when I retire?

I don't know whether retired policemen are dressed neatly, with epaulettes, ties and warning signs. Because only dressing neatly is the standard image of a policeman, otherwise, he just wears the clothes of an old policeman, and no one will treat him as a policeman. If you don't dress neatly, there will be no problem of forcibly collecting property fees in the name of the police.

I now assume that retired police officers are dressed neatly, and whether they violate the police dress code depends on the internal regulations of the public security department. We can reflect this situation to the public security department and let them define and deal with it.

The crux of the matter is whether the retired policeman constitutes an illegal act of swindling and cheating. From the letter, first of all, you know that he is a retired policeman, that is, he is not regarded as a policeman. Secondly, retired policemen wear police uniforms, which are different from those who have never been policemen. Therefore, it needs careful study to determine its swindling.

Second, can the police collect property management fees?

The police are engaged in public security management or criminal investigation. The public security department has repeatedly asked the police not to get involved in economic disputes. Therefore, the police can't charge the property management fee for the shopping mall, because it's not his duty and job. If the police collect money for the shopping mall, it is not an administrative act, but an act as a natural person, just like the police passing by the store to buy a bottle of water. Sometimes it happens. In order to deal with the contradiction between the mall and the owner in a coordinated way, the police, with the consent of both parties, do some concrete things that are conducive to resolving the contradiction, such as collection and escrow. , but by no means by administrative rights. Besides, how can a retired policeman pretend to be an administrator? He has no right.

Third, can citizens force each other?

From the above analysis, we know that retired policemen are not policemen, and it is not their duty to collect property management fees. Now, we can focus our analysis on what you mentioned: "You are arrogant and unreasonable, swearing without saying anything, threatening us to hit people and detaining us".

The attitude is outrageous and extremely unreasonable. These eight words are abstract, do not reflect specific behavior, and generally have no direct relationship with breaking the law.

Swearing and threatening to hit people are concrete acts and illegal. Because Article 42 of the People's Republic of China (PRC) Public Security Punishment Law stipulates that anyone who publicly insults others, writes threatening letters or threatens the personal safety of others by other means shall be detained for less than five days or fined less than 500 yuan; If the circumstances are serious, they shall be detained for not less than five days but not more than ten days, and may also be fined not more than 500 yuan. Swearing can be attributed to publicly insulting others. Threatening to hit people can be classified as threatening others' personal safety in other ways than threatening letters. Of course, in our daily life, we never thought that the law would be so strict. The actual implementation of the law may still have some distance. However, China's laws do have such provisions.

Seizure, which is illegal, generally does not lead to differences. Article 40 of the Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) on Public Security Punishment stipulates that those who illegally restrict the personal freedom of others, illegally invade other people's houses or illegally search other people's bodies shall be detained for more than 10 days and less than 15 days, and shall be fined between 500 yuan and 1,000 yuan; If the circumstances are relatively minor, they shall be detained for more than five days and less than ten days, and shall be fined more than 200 yuan and less than 500 yuan. Of course, the seizure mentioned here may also constitute the crime of illegal detention. Article 238 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) stipulates: "Whoever illegally detains others or illegally deprives others of their personal freedom by other means shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention, public surveillance or deprivation of political rights. Whoever beats or insults others shall be given a heavier punishment. " "Whoever commits the crime mentioned in the preceding paragraph and causes serious injuries shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years; Whoever causes death shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than ten years. Whoever uses violence to cause disability or death shall be convicted and punished in accordance with the provisions of Articles 234 and 232 of this Law. " "Whoever illegally detains another person or detains another person in order to claim debts shall be punished in accordance with the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs." State functionaries who commit the crimes mentioned in the preceding three paragraphs by taking advantage of their functions and powers shall be given a heavier punishment in accordance with the provisions of the preceding three paragraphs.

When you say that the other person is "forced", it means that you are "extremely arrogant, unreasonable, swearing without saying anything, threatening us to hit people and detaining us". We say that citizens have equal legal status, and the law does not allow one party to force the other. You can't unilaterally force you not to pay the property fee, and the other party can't unilaterally take coercive measures to force you to pay the property fee. If there is any contradiction, it can be negotiated. If negotiation fails, you can ask a third party to mediate and mediate, and then you will not enter the lawsuit. In short, we cannot act without national laws.