The new house has been accepted and renovated, but it has not yet moved in. Do I have to pay the property fee?

Everyone is familiar with the property fee. Now every community in the city will have property, and naturally there will be corresponding property fees, but how many of you people really understand property fees? Do you want to give the property? Today, I will give you a few common sense questions about real estate.

The first one is that many friends asked, if you bought a house but never moved in, do you need to pay property fees in this situation? Bian Xiao checked some information and found that whether to pay the property fee in this case is really not the owner's decision. You can't simply refuse to pay property fees because you don't enjoy property services. It depends.

The Property Management Regulations stipulate that owners have the obligation to pay property management fees on time. Although there is no clear stipulation on when the owner will start to pay, it is generally believed that the owner must pay after the delivery of the house. But there will be some different situations in real life, so whether to pay the property fee depends on the specific situation.

1. China's "Property Management Regulations" stipulates that the property that has been built but has not been sold or handed over to the property buyer shall be paid by the construction unit. In other words, if the developer delivers the house as scheduled according to the purchase contract and completes the normal handover, then the owner can start to pay the property fee after the handover is completed.

2. If the delivery is delayed due to the developer, the property fee during this period shall be borne by the developer.

3. If the developer delivers the house as scheduled, but fails to deliver the house due to the owner's reasons, then when the developer notifies the owner, the owner shall bear the corresponding property expenses thereafter. However, in some cases, there may be some provisions for underpayment or non-payment in some places, depending on the actual situation in various places.

The second question is also frequently asked. We all know that every community will have many advertisements, such as elevators, community display columns and so on. Many friends ask Bian Xiao who will get the advertising revenue. Can they ask about the property?

China's "Property Law" stipulates that advertisements in residential areas are mostly business activities that use * * * *, so whether advertisements can be placed should be decided by all owners of residential areas. If the owners agree to advertise, the proceeds should also be owned by all owners.

However, it seems unrealistic to say that the property will share all the income from advertising with everyone, but it can be used for community maintenance or offset some property fees through discussion at the owners' meeting, as long as it is the income of the owners in the end.

Therefore, owners should bravely ask the property for advertising revenue. If the property is occupied privately, the owners should also learn to safeguard their rights and conduct supervision and management through the owners' committee. Complaints and reports to the administrative department of property management; Especially serious cases, but also to the court.

Before Bian Xiao, I met some overbearing properties in China, and I actively asked for property fees. Cut off the water and electricity for me one day late, because the property is in charge of these things, but they don't take responsibility at all. This community is open and close to the school, and parents of students are picked up and dropped off every day.

The community is blocked, and there are often quarrels between the merchants in the community and the parents who "block the door". However, the property has never fundamentally solved the problem, but suppressed these merchants, and sometimes even pulled the city management to suppress the merchants. Most of the property fees in this community are paid by these merchants. These businesses are also blindly forbearing. If these businesses can learn more about property fees and use legal weapons to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, perhaps these properties will not be so arrogant.