Net exposure Vanke property brutally urges pregnant women owners to pay property fees. Is such a person suitable for property management?

Vanke Property savagely urges the deputy owner to pay the property fee, which is actually not suitable for the property. Because the property itself is a service industry, people who do the service industry should be very clear about their starting point and positioning. If we can't help others to serve others with our initial intention of serving others, this road won't work for them. They feel more pain and pressure in the process of work than real happiness. If we can start from the beginning and keep humanity, we will have more fun in this work. From a smile, a help and a thank you, we will be happy all day.

Now many people are dissatisfied with the property. I think both sides have reasons, but the property should be more tolerant. Since the property has received the property fee paid by others, it should serve others. As the owner, I hope the living environment can be quieter, and the property can provide me with a warmer residential environment. This is what property should do, not what they can do. If the property can keep this concept in mind, they won't have so many.

The relationship between the property and the owner should have been harmonious. However, there are too many contradictions. When recruiting property, each community should also fully consider whether it can serve the owners well. After all, as an owner, I really hope that my money can be reflected and I can enjoy a more peaceful life, instead of getting up every day to face parked cars and advertisements posted at random, and I am at a loss about the wall. This kind of life is not what the owner needs, but also what a property should guarantee.

So now the society should have higher requirements for property, and corresponding laws should be introduced to let them know what their minimum moral bottom line is and what their professional ethics should be.