A property in Hubei province suspected that it had killed Garfield and hung his body for public display. What responsibilities should the property bear?

I think if this thing is true, then the property needs to bear two responsibilities. First, 1 the responsibility is that it killed the owner's cat, and it has certain responsibility, and compensation and apology are essential. Secondly, the place where the property needs to be responsible is that he not only hurt the cat, but even abused it after its death, which is also responsible.

I believe everyone knows one thing, that is, while more and more people keep cats, there are more and more stray cats. Because of this, some communities have long been disturbed by too many stray cats. Many people want the property to solve this problem. I think this idea is normal and this demand is reasonable.

The property received a complaint from the owner and was completely wrong after being disturbed by stray cats. First of all, he killed a stray cat or a pet cat without asking clearly. This is completely wrong. It is precisely because he didn't make it clear in advance whether it was a pet cat or a stray cat that this tragic thing happened. Therefore, we need to be responsible for this behavior, compensate and apologize.

Secondly, after punishing the cat, the property did not choose to properly arrange its body, but chose to hang the body. I think this behavior is cruel. This behavior is no different from cat abuse.

I think since the property has done such a thing, it must apologize publicly, and then the property should put up advertising slogans or posters in the community to tell everyone to love cats instead of hurting them.

After this incident, it caused an uproar on the Internet. Many people think that the practice of the property is too cruel, and so do my thoughts, so I hope this property can assume its due responsibilities. Don't choose timidity. Now that it has been done, we should handle it properly.