Jincai real estate

It must be the responsibility of the owner on the first floor. Residents of the community informed the property when they found that the first floor was ready to smash the wall. From posting a notice to sending someone to stop it, and finally notifying the relevant departments, everything is done beautifully, although the relationship between the property and the tenants is the same. Mother-in-law But this property can't be picked out.

First, the owner of the first floor smashed the wall without consulting with the property, and it is still a load-bearing wall that must bear all the responsibilities. In Qingdao, decoration shook the whole building. Sitting at home, residents of Jincaiyuan Community found that the wall suddenly shook violently, thinking it was an earthquake. Only then did I find out that the original wall was shaking because the owner on the first floor smashed the wall. Because the building shook badly, all the residents at home basically ran downstairs. They were shocked when they saw the wall on the first floor smashed. This is a load-bearing wall!

According to the residents who live here, they reported to the property because they wanted to smash the wall on the first floor. The property posted a notice but the other party ignored the decoration. When the wall was smashed, the property came forward to stop it, and the owner still went his own way. At this time, the property had to call the relevant departments for help, but the load-bearing wall had been smashed by the owners. It has already happened.

As can be seen from the above description, the property has done due diligence in this incident. Residents responded positively and cooperated with the treatment, and immediately reported to the relevant departments if any abnormality was found. On the contrary, the owner did not report to the property before smashing the wall, and the property did not listen to the advice after dissuasion, resulting in the destruction of the wall. Therefore, no matter what problems occur later, they have nothing to do with the property, and the responsibility should be borne by the owners on the first floor.

Second, the smashed wall is not a load-bearing wall, but there is no evidence. If the wall is subsequently identified as a load-bearing wall, the reinforcement fee and fine shall be borne by the owner. After the residents complained, the reporter contacted the owner on the first floor, but by this time, the owner's attitude was still very tough. He kept saying that the wall he smashed was not a load-bearing wall but an ordinary wall, and he wanted to expand the use area. Then the reporter contacted the relevant departments to understand the situation. The law enforcement department said that the owner said that he had the original drawings of the building, which clearly indicated that the wall was not a load-bearing wall, but an ordinary wall with windows, but he could not take it out.

The staff said that if the owner can't produce relevant materials, he will go through legal procedures. After all, it's not small to hit the load-bearing wall. The damaged load-bearing wall needs to be repaired by a professional and qualified construction company, and the subsequent reinforcement work should be done well to prevent the building from tilting or even collapsing due to the lack of load-bearing wall, and these expenses need to be borne by the owner on the first floor.

In addition, the regulations on load-bearing walls vary from place to place. For example, Shanghai stipulates that if the load-bearing wall is demolished, it must not only be restored to its original state, but also bear the corresponding fine. If Qingdao has corresponding regulations, then the owners on the first floor will be fined after the wall is repaired. Therefore, the load-bearing wall can't move!

Third, a house with a broken load-bearing wall must be uninhabitable, otherwise it will be fatal if the house falls down. The saddest thing about this is that the residents of the whole building have become dangerous buildings because of the renovation of the first floor, and the load-bearing walls have been destroyed, so they can't go back to their houses or live. If this matter continues to drag on, it will really become a real version of the case with no home to return. As far as the owner's attitude is concerned, if there is really a resident who is desperate to live in such a house and causes an accident, he will also say: You all say that the dangerous building is still living and something has happened.

We can't live in this building until things are settled, and the most troublesome thing about this matter is that the owner who smashed the wall and took away the steel bars is not this person at present. Although he smashed the wall, he only smashed the brick wall without steel bars, so it will take some time to say who is in charge. After all, there were two owners in the shop, and both of them smashed the load-bearing wall. Let's wait for the relevant departments to judge right and wrong.

Finally: the residents in this building are really miserable. No matter whether this wall is a load-bearing wall or not, who dares to live in such a swaying place?