Don't owners have the responsibility to throw things, especially security guards, but it's useless without monitoring. It's also called professional management.

Whether the owner is responsible for the loss of property should be viewed from several aspects:

1. First of all, is there an agreement in the contract signed between the property and the owner that the property will take care of the private property for the owner? If so, the property should bear corresponding responsibilities.

2. Whether the agreement of the property in the contract is performed normally, such as setting up a security guard box, but no one is on duty, or someone is on duty but fails to fulfill the duty of proper duty, and the post has not been recorded for normal handover. (In a word, you can prove that the property manager is dereliction of duty) Then, the property should bear corresponding responsibilities.

3. Whether the facilities provided by the developer and the property have been put into normal use (such as surveillance video, etc.). ), if the development is normally equipped and the property is not put into normal use, then the property should bear certain responsibilities.

4. On the other hand, if the property personnel are on duty normally, the handover record is normal, the facilities and equipment are running normally, and the property contract stipulates that the property is only responsible for assisting the public security organs to maintain the public order in the community, then the owner does not need to bear the responsibility for the loss of items.