Job Recruitment Website - Property management company - How about the Jinan branch of Oceanwide Property Management Co., Ltd.?
How about the Jinan branch of Oceanwide Property Management Co., Ltd.?
The unified social credit code/registration number of Jin 'an Branch of Oceanwide Property Management Co., Ltd. is 91370103664878166h, and Zheng Yilong is an enterprise legal person. At present, the enterprise is in the state of opening.
The business scope of Jinan Branch of Oceanwide Property Management Co., Ltd. is: property management; Mechanical and electrical equipment (excluding special equipment) maintenance; Sales: elevators, escalators, daily necessities, hardware products, household appliances; Landscaping services; Public parking service for motor vehicles. (Projects subject to approval according to law can only be operated after approval by relevant departments). In Shandong Province, the total registered capital of companies with similar business scope is 3,408.9 million yuan, and the main capital is concentrated in100-1000,000 and1000-50,000,000 enterprises, with 926 enterprises. Within the scope of this province, the registered capital of mobile enterprises belongs to the general.
View more information and materials of Jinan Branch of Oceanwide Property Management Co., Ltd. through Baidu Enterprise Credit.
- Related articles
- Baoneng Group was exposed that its headquarters was "empty" and the company responded.
- What is the telephone number of Yixihu Marketing Center in Tianjin Wuqing Country Garden?
- Annual work summary, residential property electrician
- How many days of paid annual leave does Guiyang Zhongtian Property have?
- Who will pay the rental property fee during the application period of Shenzhen rental subsidy?
- What is the telephone number of Haimen Evergrande Emerald Hua Ting Marketing Center?
- How about Zhaodong Manor Factory?
- What is the address of Lanchi County in Xigang?
- Does the property have the right to charge the elevator fee separately? Is it legal?
- What's the difference between security and security?