What is the behavior of the owner to change the door lock without the consent of the property?

The description of the problem is not clear enough. I can only show you the same case and see for myself whether it belongs to the same behavior.

■ The owner closes the corridor space with doors, and the public facilities such as pipeline wells are closed together.

In the renovation of a two-story apartment, an owner changed the corridor door and locks, making the corridor a closed and unique space. This has brought a lot of inconvenience to property inspection and maintenance. "This kind of behavior still has security risks. In case of water pipe leakage or fire, the consequences are unimaginable. Just because the electric wells and pipeline wells in the corridor have been' circled'. " The person in charge of the property said that after discovering this situation, the property also gave the other party a rectification notice, and communicated many times during the period, but this situation has not changed at present.

This happened in Unit 5 1 Courtyard 8 1 Shengli South Street. According to the person in charge of the residential property, the residential property was handed over in May last year, and then owners successively renovated and moved in. This situation was discovered in the daily inspection of the property in June165438+1October last year. The two households on this floor are the same owner.

On the morning of July 18, the reporter came to the problem floor of the unit. As soon as I got out of the elevator and looked left, the reporter found a secret door leading to the corridor. The door was closed, pushed and pulled by hand, and no one answered when knocking.

Reporters can only go to other floors to understand the situation in the corridor. On other floors, the reporter saw that the door at the entrance of Loudaokou was uniformly installed and the door was open. Entering the corridor, I saw fire hydrant devices, electric wells and pipeline wells all with doors. According to the person in charge of the residential property, the electric well is a power distribution meter and line device, and the tube well is a heating pipe and a tap water pipe.

The person in charge of the property said that in June last year165438+1October, the staff found that the owner on the first floor of the unit had removed the corridor door and the doors of the electric well and pipeline well, and was ready to replace them. The staff immediately told him to stop work and sent a rectification notice to the other party, but the other owner ignored it and continued the installation. Since last year, the property staff has communicated with it many times, but nothing has changed.

"According to the regulations, the corridor belongs to public space and cannot be occupied. Because public equipment such as pipeline wells are also in the corridor, the daily inspection is blocked. In particular, the space is sealed, and once the pipeline leaks, there will be a fire. If it happens, it can't be handled in time, and there are great hidden dangers. " The head of the property said.

In view of this, the interviewed owners think this practice is unreasonable. "If the leakage of the pipeline is not handled in time, the elevator or the owner's house downstairs may also be affected."

On the afternoon of July 18, the reporter contacted the owner of this floor. After communication, the other party agreed to discuss with his family and correct it as soon as possible.

Liu Ming, secretary-general of Shijiazhuang Property Association, believes that the public space outside the exclusive part, including the corridor, belongs to the owner and cannot be occupied by individuals. This situation is more serious than putting debris in the corridor, which has potential safety hazards. Liu Ming suggested that the property can be reflected to the office, the district housing and construction department, the fire department and other departments, and be restored to its original state from the perspective of the safety of the whole building.