A property employee in Changsha fell to his death and claimed 8 1 1,000 yuan from the owner of the building. How did the court decide?

It is untenable to claim 8 1 000 yuan from the owner for the death of a property employee in a residential area in Hexi, Changsha without thinking about it. The Liu family is also wonderful to find compensation for the owner. The court directly ruled that there was no labor relationship between the deceased Liu and the owner, and Liu's family's claim for compensation was unfounded, and the appeal was directly rejected.

0 1, Liu belongs to the staff of the property management company. When he collapsed, he found that Liu of the property management company belonged to the staff of the property management company. Before the accident, the roof of Building A was flooded due to rain, and Liu was told to go up to clean up the accumulated water and accidentally fell down. If you accidentally fall to your death while cleaning the roof, you shouldn't claim compensation from the owner. Asking for a claim is also asking for a claim from the property company. You can't think that the owner is also responsible because Liu is doing cleaning work for A house. Because Liu is an employee of a property management company, roof cleaning belongs to his work scope, and the owner is not at fault within this scope. The rejection of the Liu family in the second instance is the best proof. How can such unreasonable demands be supported? If this claim is reasonable, the owner will have to pay compensation for the injuries suffered by the property staff in the future. I estimate that the owners are afraid to live in the community managed by the property company, and no amount of money is enough to compensate.

02. The owner buys a house to live in, which does not belong to the residential area where the property employer has property management. Owners only enjoy paid property services, and pay property management fees to property companies every month for the maintenance and management of public areas of the building. It is not the owner who directly pays Liu, and there is no employment relationship with Liu. The owner of the whole building is also a talent, knowing that he can't get much compensation from the property management company, so he simply asks the owner for 8 10000 compensation. There is nothing to lose if you lose, but you can get a sum of money if you win. This kind of family is not the first time I have seen it. They got drunk, ran into a street lamp and died. All family members sued the road for installing street lamps. It is not uncommon for the Liu family to lose money by the owner. Nowadays, some great family members will make money as long as they can find a little excuse. Especially if your loved ones are killed, you should pay compensation even if it is unreasonable. There are too many such people.

03. Zuowei Liu property employees, falling off buildings without safety awareness, also made some mistakes. Liu's accidental fall from the building is not entirely the responsibility of the property company, let alone the fault of the owner. Family members put the blame on the owner, that is, they feel that the owner has paid the property fee and Liu is the relationship between the employer and the employee. This misunderstanding makes them confident to seek compensation from the owner, and Liu himself is also responsible for his fall. On the day of falling, Liu actually wore slippers to the roof to clean up the stagnant water, and the roof was covered with moss. Slippers will inevitably slip when stepped on, and even the most basic safety awareness is lacking. How can you do property work? Liu lacks safety awareness and has to bear certain responsibilities himself. This time, it is reasonable for the court to reject Liu's family's demands, and unreasonable compensation claims will not be supported, otherwise there will be no community to ask the property company to manage it in the future.