Taking part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time par

Taking part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time Thank you for your passionate statement just now! However, even if your tongue is full of orchids, you can't reverse black and white. The arguments of other debaters are getting better and better, but it's a pity that no matter how much you talk about it, it's all water without a source, because your definition and premise are wrong.

On page 244 of Modern Chinese Dictionary, the word "part-time job" is interpreted as: part-time job means work, which refers to temporary work. As for "part-time job", 1830 is interpreted as: engaging in manual labor. It can be seen that, whether in reality or in dictionaries, college students are mostly engaged in repetitive low-level labor.

Looking at the premise again, the purpose of discussing this debate is its guiding significance. That is to give contemporary college students, especially those present here, a correct guidance and advice. And its premise should be that the object we want to guide has the right to choose whether to work or not. If we focus on a few college students who can't continue their studies and survive without working, then this discussion will lose its meaning, because conditions lead them to have no choice at all.

On this premise, in order to prove that college students do more harm than good, we put forward the following two standards:

First, from a personal micro point of view, college students are not worth the loss.

First of all, we should allocate our limited time and energy reasonably. As we all know, the university is the last critical period of systematically accepting knowledge in life, and the main task of college students should be learning. Lack of knowledge, no matter how capable people are, is also "a clever woman can't cook without rice"! However, if you put your time into part-time jobs, you will only accumulate the general experience you can get from low-level work and communication on campus, while the special experience that is helpful to future workplace communication and professional work is not available to on-the-job college students. Therefore, from the perspective of input and output, it is not wise for college students to work.

Secondly, from the perspective of personality shaping, college students do more harm than good. Under the premise that college students' psychological quality is not mature enough and their judgment ability is weak, they are easy to blindly enter the society, and are easily influenced by bad social habits and wrong consciousness, resulting in distorted psychology and wrong outlook on life values, which seriously hinders the shaping of college students' personality.

Finally, the rights and interests of college students at work can not be effectively guaranteed. At present, the law is not perfect, the cost of safeguarding rights is high, college students' awareness of safeguarding rights is weak, and the law enforcement is insufficient. After the rights and interests of college students are infringed, they can usually only "bite their teeth and swallow their blood".

The second criterion, that is, from a social macro perspective, college students' part-time jobs are not conducive to the optimal allocation of social labor resources. College students are a special social group, and their task at this stage is to accumulate knowledge in order to make better contributions to society in the future. If college students are allowed to engage in those basic jobs during this period, it is obviously a waste of human resources, and it is inevitable to lose big because of small. I believe that the opposing defense friend will not be willing to give up the opportunity to become a famous lawyer and an excellent judge in the future and can't wait to be an ordinary labor force with low price and high quality! Therefore, college students' part-time jobs are not conducive to the benign and sustainable development of the whole society.

To sum up, under the premise of effective choice, starting from the two standards of individual and society, it is fully proved that the disadvantages of college students' part-time job outweigh the advantages!