The property was stopped when the fire truck entered the community. Why did it stop the fire truck? Will the property be punished?

The property was stopped when the fire truck entered the community. Why did it stop the fire truck? Will the property be punished?

First, why was the fire truck stopped by the property when it entered the community? We ordinary people usually avoid fire engines when we see them on the road, because as we all know, fire engines must be in a hurry and need help. If people are delayed, it is likely to cause very serious consequences. However, in a residential area in Dezhou, Shandong Province, a resident called the fireman for help because of difficulties, and the fireman also dispatched a fire truck to the community to rescue the resident at the first time. However, when I walked to the door of the community, the community property did not drive a fire truck. After many times of communication between firefighters and the property, the security guard at the door refused to give firefighters a lift, and many owners were very angry with the security guard. After being questioned by many owners, the security guard remained indifferent. Several owners and on-site firefighters lifted the railing together, and the fire truck finally entered the community smoothly.

Second, how did the property respond to this matter? After the incident, the property also issued a statement at the first time, saying that it was not the security guard who refused to let the firefighters go, because the remote control was broken, so there was no way to lift the railing. The property also explained that there was a traffic jam at the entrance where the firefighters entered, so they wanted to let the firefighters go to the south gate. In this case, they insisted on the rescue action of firefighters. Many people also said that they could not understand the property statement. Because no matter whether the remote control was broken or not, the fire-fighting vehicles should be allowed to enter at the first time, instead of letting the firefighters wait at the door. If they can't enter the community, they will never save those in need. In case of any serious consequences, the property is obviously unable to escape responsibility.

Third, how to evaluate the practice of property? Every place has a fire escape. No matter where we go to work or in residential areas, fire exits are life-saving escape routes. Once the fire escape is blocked or an accident occurs, the rescue activities will be terminated and the consequences will be very serious. Although this incident has not caused obvious serious consequences, it is obvious that the local people have already felt that the property work is not in place. Moreover, when the owners need help, the property and security guards still do nothing, which shows that they have not paid attention to the legitimate rights and interests of the owners at all. Therefore, it is natural for the property to be condemned by the owners. I hope they can face up to their own problems and correct them in time so that similar things will not happen again.