Property smashing owner's private car

Some time ago, I saw a message on the Internet that Mr. Li of a certain community drove home from work and parked his car in the parking space of his community. As a result, the next morning, he found that the car was damaged by the strong wind. After reporting the car damage, Mr. Li asked the property to compensate for the loss of the car, but the property company thought that he was not responsible and refused to pay compensation. Finally, Mr. Li sued the court, and the court supported Mr. Li's claim and sentenced the property company to compensate Mr. Li for the maintenance cost of the damaged vehicle. After this incident spread to the internet, netizens were divided into two factions, those who supported it and those who opposed it. In my opinion, according to the relevant laws and regulations of our country, the property management company should bear the loss of vehicle maintenance for the following reasons: 1, the property management company has the responsibility and obligation to look after the vehicles parked in the community; 2. The property management company failed to take preventive measures against falling objects; 3. The property management company will repair the damaged wall in time.

? Property companies have the responsibility and obligation to take good care of the vehicles parked in the community. The relationship between the property company and the owner is employment and being employed, service and being served. Mr. Li parked his car in the parking space of his residential area and paid the parking fee to the property company on time. At the same time, vehicles entering and leaving the community also paid parking fees. Then, the property company has the responsibility and obligation to take good care of Mr. Li's vehicle, and can't just collect money and fail to fulfill its obligations.

? The property management company failed to take preventive measures against falling objects in advance. The newly promulgated civil code has written the relevant situation of falling objects into the legal provisions. Property management companies should pay attention to falling objects and falling walls in the process of service management. In this case, the property management company did not repair the damaged wall in time, nor did it remind Mr. Li to pay attention to the vehicles parked here, so it did not take preventive responsibility in advance and should compensate.

? As a service provider, the property company should maintain the public facilities within its jurisdiction and use the maintenance fund to timely repair the damaged public facilities to meet the owners' demand for the safety and beautification of the public facilities in the community. Obviously, the property management company failed to fulfill its responsibilities in the service process, only thinking about making more money, failing to fulfill its due responsibilities and not upgrading to the corresponding service level.